User talk:Russell7890

June 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Fakescientist8000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Draft:Alexander King, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. IMDb is not a reliable source. See WP:IMDB. Cheers, atque supra! Fake scientist 8000 00:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Horror-noir moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Horror-noir, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has undergone constructive revision. Consider transferring Draft:Horror-noir to the actual article after checking this link. Thanks! Russell7890 (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Horror-noir[edit]

Hello Russell7890,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Horror-noir for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has underwent a constructive, well-improved revision. Please take a look and review it and consider it moving to article space officially. Russell7890 (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reworked version links to here: Draft:Horror-noir Russell7890 (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I published the page today. I believe it is notable. The page can be improved. Some of the crime horror films listed, even with a source, are not, in my view, noir horror films, but if a source says so, who am I. to judge? As for Religious horror, below, however, I think adding a section to Supernatural horror film is, for the moment, better. But again, if you have sources, it's up to you. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I appreciate this a lot. Russell7890 (talk) 02:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think the religious horror film draft is unnecessary considering that it’s also past of supernatural horror, but thanks for letting me know Russell7890 (talk) 02:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Horrorscope (film) (October 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will need to be disambiguated for acceptance.

If this draft is accepted, the disambiguation page will need to be edited. Either an entry will need to be added, or an entry will need to be revised.

The disambiguation page for the primary name is Horrorscope (disambiguation).

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Horrorscope (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blade (2025 upcoming film) has been accepted[edit]

Blade (2025 upcoming film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nagol0929 (talk) 12:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks a lot! Have a good one! Russell7890 (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Price of Money: A Largo Winch Adventure (film) has been accepted[edit]

The Price of Money: A Largo Winch Adventure (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:14, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for reviewing and moving the article to space. Much appreciated. Have a nice day! Russell7890 (talk) 15:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About Blade[edit]

Hello there. I saw you made a Draft:Blade (2025 upcoming film) and that it was accepted for the mainspace. However, we already have a draft article located at Draft:Blade (2025 film). As per Wikipedia policies such as WP:NFF and WP:CONTENTFORK, no filming has occurred and the page you created was almost a duplicate of the content at the preceding draft. With no filming yet, neither should be in the main article space. As such, I have redirected it to Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Five#Blade (2025) until the draftspace article is ready when filming begins. Thank your for your understanding and your willingness to contribute! I encourage you review these policies I mentioned before continuing with article creation and to double check what content is already out there. Cheers, and enjoy your time here! Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just noticed that. I had no idea that there was already a draft created for the film until this message. Nevertheless, as soon as the film takes place, will the article that was accepted to be moved to the space be used or will it have to have another submission of a draft again, which is the Draft: Blade (2025 film)? Russell7890 (talk) 15:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Draft:Blade (2025 film) will be the article moved once filming begins (strikes permitted) as it has the basis of more editing history in it. You are free to contribute to that draft anytime. Draft:Blade (2025 upcoming film) currently points to the main draft, and will follow it as the main one. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I didn't realize that a draft with the same topic and title already existed. Usually, Wikipedia would have let users know and be informed about this before writing any drafts, and it would give you a link to the existing article or draft space about having the same title and content, but in this one, it didn't. Other than that, I appreciate the immediate notice and message. Have a good one! Russell7890 (talk) 16:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Religious horror has been accepted[edit]

Religious horror, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 02:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping[edit]

Hi, just an fyi, I think most of your replies on this page never got read by the person you were trying to talk to, because you didn't use a ping. When you write a reply to an AfC message like the one from Paper9oll above, we never see it unless we specifically watchlist your talk page! You can use any of the variations of Template:Ping, or when you use Discussion Tools (the editor that opens up when you click "reply" on a message) you can type @ and then the person's username. I'll trigger one for you so you can see what happens: @Russell7890. -- asilvering (talk) 07:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alexander King (actor)[edit]

Hello, Russell7890. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexander King (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alexander King (actor)[edit]

Hello, Russell7890. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexander King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]