User talk:Rwunderlich

Welcome!

Hello, Rwunderlich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your message to Gogo Dodo

...was intercepted by an automatic system designed to prevent, among other things, messages containing personal attacks. I have forwarded it, but would ask you to read Wikipedia:Civility. JohnCD (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My edits to SOT-A were done to remove the personal commentary regarding disagreements with the content of the article. Wikipedia articles are not forums for discussing changes or issues. That is the function of the article talk pages. Gripes about command not utilizing SOT-A teams to their best abilities does not belong in the article either as again, Wikipedia articles are not forums.

As for the issue if it is "Support" or "Special", page Glossary-23 of the two references used in the article list it as "Special". There was also a recent press release from the NSA honoring two SOT-A service members and the release lists it as "Special". I did look up what you referenced, FM 34-36, Chapter 4, and there is indeed reference to "Support". But unless my understanding is incorrect, the reference FM 3-05.102 as used in the article supersedes FM 34-36 (the previous link) as FM 3-05.102 has a later publication date.

I have left a message at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history asking for interested editors to review the article and resolve the issue. The editors at that WikiProject have an interest in all things military and can verify or correct the article. The post I left is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Help_with_SOT-A.

You are welcome to change, update, or expand the article as much as you wish, but you should not re-add personal commentary about previous revisions of the article or the editors that made them. The article is poorly referenced, so if you can locate and cite additional references for the article, you are more than welcome to do so. However, those references must be from reliable sources that are available for verification. Unfortunately, your personal knowledge regarding the structure of the teams should not generally be used as a reference. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I see that you found the most recent FM and have updated the article. Thank you for that and I think that settles that particular issue.

As for the Capabilities section, that is indeed unsourced. The preferable fix would be to find the proper sources and correct the section. I do realize that due to the nature of the teams, finding public sources may be difficult. If sources can't be found and the section is completely wrong, then it can be deleted or completely rewritten. As for deleting the entire article, that likely will not happen as the topic is notable and some article in some form or another should exist. Do you have the time to research the necessary sources to cite the Capabilities section? The sources don't have to be FMs. The can be any reliable source: news articles, interviews, books, etc. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support operations teams A (SOTAs) are ground-based SIGINT teams that perform electronic support and are organic to the battalion military intelligence detachment. The SOTA mission is to monitor the electromagnetic spectrum in an SO environment to perform SR and to support force protection. This intercept and direction-finding capability gives the ARSOF commander a SIGINT collection asset that is directly responsive to his needs in understanding the operational environment. FM 3-05 (FM 100-25) dated September 2006

Conflict of interest?

Hello, Rwunderlich. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article SOT-A, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mike, thank you for your comments. I do, in fact, go about making the correction improperly.

Most of the page is not cited and is, in fact, created from the author's imagination. I should have requested the page be deleted due to lack of citation instead of correcting the page based on personal experience.

It is offensive to see false information about my profession on Wikipedia, especially since I use it frequently for reference.

Thanks again.174.228.199.49 (talk) 22:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just want a little quality control Mike:

Support operations teams A (SOTAs) are ground-based SIGINT teams that perform electronic support and are organic to the battalion military intelligence detachment. The SOTA mission is to monitor the electromagnetic spectrum in an SO environment to perform SR and to support force protection. This intercept and direction-finding capability gives the ARSOF commander a SIGINT collection asset that is directly responsive to his needs in understanding the operational environment. FM 3-05 (FM 100-25) dated September 2006

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert William Wunderlich (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

The text of this submission has been removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning biographies of living persons; we cannot accept such articles if they are unsourced, or contain unverifiable information which is potentially defamatory. All articles about living persons must conform to our biographies of living persons policy. In order to permit the author of this submission to provide sources that may satisfy the policy, the text of the page is available in the history.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sections are not sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert William Wunderlich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert William Wunderlich, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rwunderlich! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Robert William Wunderlich concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert William Wunderlich, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert William Wunderlich

Hello, Rwunderlich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert William Wunderlich".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]