User talk:RyanTheRedZombie

September 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to List of assets owned by Microsoft Corporation, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RyanTheRedZombie/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:RyanTheRedZombie/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RyanTheRedZombie! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 20:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Unbreakable vow[edit]

Hello RyanTheRedZombie,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Unbreakable vow for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Warm-blooded organisms[edit]

The article Warm-blooded organisms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No Sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 21:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Test (assessment)[edit]

If you want to move the article you need to start a discussion at Talk:Test (assessment). Titles that have been stable for a long time should not be moved without discussion. Also Academic Examination would not be correct but Academic examination might be. There is no reason to capitalise the word examination. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

World Wars[edit]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 21:54, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:RyanTheRedZombie/sandbox[edit]

Hello, RyanTheRedZombie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:RyanTheRedZombie/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Narwhal. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rhinopias (talk) 03:28, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]