User talk:Ryangibsonstewart

Welcome!

Welcome, Ryangibsonstewart!

I noticed your work on Ambigram, and thought I'd welcome you to Wikipedia. My name is Dan, a.k.a. Audacity. Thank you for your contributions, and I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Some other hints and tips:

Since you have created a username, you have the privilege of customizing your own user page, which is here. You can also tell us more about yourself at Wikipedia:New user log.
When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Or come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

Thanks again for contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.

Λυδ α cιτγ 23:15, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian?

Hi - I'm guessing Wikipedia talk:Searching#alban skenderaj is written in Albanian and that it's meant to be an article about a pop singer (in which case it's completely misplaced). Any chance you could confirm this? Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Translation

Hello! A while ago you signed up to help translate articles from other Wikipedias at Wikipedia:Translators available.

This page has since become obsolete and has been replaced by two userbox templates.

If you are still interested in translating, you may sign up again by using one of the following userboxes on your userpage (while changing, of course, the codes according to the languages you speak):

   {{Translator|es|Spanish}} 
   {{Proofreader|fr|French}}

We hope to see you soon on Wikipedia:Translation!

No content in Category:Little Einsteins episodes

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Little Einsteins episodes, by HokieRNB, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Little Einsteins episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Little Einsteins episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Little Einsteins episodes itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland Grammar School

Could you please write a stub http://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auckland_Grammar_School - just a few sentences based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auckland Grammar School? Only 2-5 sentences enough. Please. ---- 06:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Done. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very much Ryangibsonstewart for your help! You are great. ---- 22:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Albanian proofreader/translator categories

I've gone ahead and corrected the boxes on your userpage to show the correct ISO 639 code for the Albanian language. The relevant categories are now at Category:Translators sq-en and Category:Proofreaders sq-en. --- RockMFR 17:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I wasn't quite sure how to do that, so I appreciate you taking care of that for me. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 06:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image of Anthony Miner

Hi! While it may seem sensible that images with permission to be used on Wikipedia are allowed, our mission is to provide gratis content, and as such all images with such permission are deleted on sight. Could you please try to get Anthony to release the image under a free license such as the GFDL or CC-BY-SA? Thanks! east.718 at 23:58, January 20, 2008

Just have him send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org specifying the license of his choice, then upload it make a note on the image page that permission has been sent to OTRS. east.718 at 00:07, January 21, 2008

AfD nomination of Anthony Miner

An editor has nominated Anthony Miner, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Miner and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to your question in the AfD, how to go about nominating an article for restoration: If and once things change with respect to sources, you can create a new draft in your user space or ask me or any other administrator to restore the article there. If that is accepted, you can work on it and it can then either be moved back to mainspace or discussed further at deletion review. If you directly create the article in wikispace, it is possible that the article gets speedily deleted, so you should do so only in case of very substantial coverage or new documented awards. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Our Big Huge Adventure.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Our Big Huge Adventure.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation needed

Hi,

I noticed your username on the list of available translators for Albanian language.

Will you please be so kind to translate the following sentence to English:

një interpretim që gjëlloi edhe në vitet '80 të shekullit 20, e pra në prag të krizës së Kosovës, kur propagandistet serbë e brohorisnin Skënderbeun si "bir të Ivanit, Gjorgj Kastrioti, kalorësi serb i Arbërise

Best regards,

--Antidiskriminator (talk) 06:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"One interpretation that was revived even in the '80s of the 20th Century, and therefore on the verge of the Kosovo crisis, when Serbian propagandists cheered Skanderbeg as 'the son of Ivan, Gjorgj Kastrioti, Serbian cavalry of Arbëria'". Hope that works for you! - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for bothering you again, but I need one more sentence to be translated:

"Kur "Skënderbeu" nuk asht historia e Skënderbeut : dy fjalë rreth librit "Skënderbeu" të Oliver Jens Schmitt"

Thanks in advance.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Në Malin e Zi, që i kishte strukturat e veta fisnore shumë të ngjashme me ato të Shqipërisë së veriut, çka sillte edhe një afri në mendësi, Skënderbeu u kremtua si ideali i burrërisë heroike, si luftëtar sllav dhe mishërimi i një shtrirjeje politike të Malit të Zi në Arbëri të veriut.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The first one: "When 'Skanderbeg' is not the history of Skanderbeg: a few words about the book "Skanderbeg" by Oliver Jens Schmitt"
The second one: "In Montenegro, which had its own clan structures similar to those in northern Albania, so it produces a mental affinity, Skanderbeg was celebrated as the ideal of heroic manhood, as a Slavic warrior and the epitome of a political extension of Montenegro in northern Arbëria."
I hope that helps! - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 02:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any time! :) - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 04:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation needed (2)

Hi! I noticed you are listed at Wikipedia:Translators available. Could you please take a look at a post at Talk:Battle of Vukovar#Next steps: a call for assistance and advise whether you might be able to help in terms of an Albanian summary? In a nutshell, a group of editors would like to get the Battle of Vukovar featured on the main page on the battle anniversary on 18 November and our chances would be improved if there were more articles about it in other language Wikipedias. It does not need to be long, a translation of the lead section or its summary would be sufficient. Thank you! Timbouctou (talk) 00:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the best at putting things into Albanian, I'm much better at translating Albanian into English. But I also realize that my language skills, though not called upon very frequently, are not found in great demand. Here's a translation of the lead section. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beteja e Vukovarit ishte një 87-ditor rrethimi i Vukovarit në Kroacinë lindore nga Ushtrisë Popullore Jugosllave, mbështetur nga forca të ndryshme paramilitare nga Serbia, në mes të gushtit dhe nëntor 1991. Para Luftës Kroate e Pavarësisë, qyteti barok ishte një komuniteti i begatë, të kroatëve, serbëve, dhe grupeve të tjera etnike. Në vitin 1990, politikat nacionaliste, të ndjekura nga Presidenti Sllobodan Millosheviçit të Serbisë dhe presidenti i Kroacisë Franjo Tugjman, çoi në shpërthimin e një kryengritje të armatosur nga serbët e Kroacisë, të mbështetur nga qeveria serbe dhe grupet paramilitare. Si militarët serbë kroat mori kontrollin e serbëve të zonave të populluara të Kroacisë, ushtria jugosllave filloi të ndërhyjë në favor të rebelimit. Konflikti shpërtheu në rajonin lindor kroat të Sllavonisë në Maj 1991. Në gusht, ushtria jugosllave ka nisur një sulm në shkallë të gjerë kundër Kroacisë-territori mbajtur në Sllavoninë Lindore, duke përfshirë edhe Vukovarit.

Vukovari u mbrojt me rreth 1,800 ushtarë të armatosur lehtë të Gardës Kombëtare Kroate dhe vullnetarë civile, kundër 36,000 ushtarëve yugosllave dhe paramilitarët serbë të pajisur me forca të blinduara të rënda dhe artileri. Gjatë betejës, predha dhe raketa u qëlluan në qytet në një normë prej 12,000 për ditë. Në të njëtën kohë, kjo ishte beteja të ashpra dhe më të zgjatura në Evropë, dhe Vukovar ishte i pari qytet i madh evropian shkatërruar tërësisht që prej Lufta e Dytë Botërore. Kur Vukovar ra në 18 nëntor 1991, qindra ushtarë dhe civilë u masakruan nga forcat serbe, dhe së paku 31,000 civilë u dëbuan nga qyteti dhe rrethinat e saj. Vukovar ishte pastruar etnikisht nga jo-serbe popullsisë së saj dhe u bë pjesë e vetëshpallur Republika e Krajinës Serbe. Disa zyrtarë serbë ushtarake dhe politike, duke përfshirë edhe Millosheviqit, ishin të akuzuar më vonë dhe në disa raste u burgos për krime lufte të kryera gjatë dhe pas betejës.

Beteja rraskapitur ushtrinë jugosllave dhe i provoi një pikë kthese në luftën kroate. Një armëpushim është shpallur disa javë më vonë. Vukovari ka mbetur në duart serbe deri në vitin 1998 kur ajo ishte ri-integruar në mënyrë paqësore në Kroaci. Ajo ka qenë që rindërtuar, por ka më pak se gjysma e popullsisë së para luftës dhe shumë ndërtesa janë plagosur ende nga beteja. Dy komuniteteve etnike kryesore të tij mbeten thellësisht të ndarë dhe nuk ka rifituar prosperitetin e saj të mëparshëm.

It's not perfect, but there you go. :) - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 02:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! I've created the article Beteja e Vukovarit on the Albanian Wikipedia using your translation. If you have time you could wikify it a bit and maybe put it in some appropriate category. Thanks for your help! Timbouctou (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for translation

Hi Ryangibsonstewart, I'm expanding the article on the Corfu Channel Case. I was wondering if you could translate this book title for me? "Incidenti i kanalit të Korfuzit : drejtësi e anuar" Google Translate suggests the first part is just "Corfu Channel Incident" but the part after the colon gets mangled. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 03:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ryangibsonstewart. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ryangibsonstewart. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ryangibsonstewart. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Our Huge Adventure

The article Our Huge Adventure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, only 1 critic review found (listed at Rotten Tomatoes), everything else appears to be a blog or a database site. Tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]