User talk:S.O.Malphas

My post regarding Malphas constitutes vandalism you say? Your words constitute discrimination. In what way is the truth "vandalism"? Nothing i said was in discrimination of anything, or in any way offensive to anyone. I am simply putting out the truth for people to see. Is this what you are afraid of perhaps? If you think i am wrong, do you have proof that what you are saying is right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malphas

Vovim Baghie

January 2009[edit]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Jake Wartenberg. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jake Wartenberg^Talk 13:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jake Wartenberg[edit]

When an editor repeatedly removes a post from their page, it probably means they don't want it there. Please stop replacing your comments at User talk:Jake Wartenberg. I agree that it wasn't vandalism, but that doesn't mean you can't be blocked for breaking the 3 revert rule. --Onorem ♠Dil 14:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Malphas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Onorem ♠Dil 16:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]