User talk:SDZeroBot/Wikipedians by most GANs/Errors

Copper(I) Chloride[edit]

Hi, SD0001: I looked into Copper(I) Chloride, and think I can safely say it had no nominator. It was assessed as A-class here, confirmed here, moved and confirmed here and then added to the list of GAs in a bulk addition of A-class WPCHEM articles here. Does that sound right/make sense? It may also clear up several other WPCHEM articles like this. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

also, can your bot handle co-nominations? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any definite way to identify a co-nominator? (For the nominator, we're just looking at who added {{GA nominee}}.) – SD0001 (talk) 17:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I knew that back in the day it was a quite a bit looser. Probably worth just marking them as unknown and take any that are not in a good enough shape through reassessment. AIRcorn (talk) 00:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891: That's what I observed too. Most of these articles don't seem to have been nominated by anyone at all. They were just marked as GA without {{GA nominee}} or an equivalent template ever having been on the talk page. – SD0001 (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]