User talk:SJB689
| File:Walther PPK.jpg | WikiProject Rugby league | |
| Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed you have made some edits relating to rugby league. May I interest you in joining the Rugby league WikiProject, which aims to greatly improve the rugby league articles on Wikipedia. To join simply add your name to the participants list. You may wish to seek some help about the WikiProject, if so please ask your question here. If you need help on general Wikipedia place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question. SpecialWindler talk 06:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC) |
Nice work on the article. May I suggest you add some more content, similar to 2007 Rugby League State of Origin series? Happy editing, Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
WikiProject Rugby league (State of Origin task force) | |
| A new task force has begun to improve the scope, quality and coverage of Rugby League State of Origin on Wikipedia. This task force is part of the WikiProject Rugby league. Please add your name at the participants page. The current to do part, is completing the "requested articles" which can be found on the main page. If you wish to join you can add one of the following (as a userbox):
{{User WikiProject Rugby league State of Origin|nsw}} |
Wests Tigers Representatives[edit]
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Wests Tigers Representatives, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. NeilN 20:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Rugby League Season Pages[edit]
Hey I appreciate your work on the season pages. However, can I suggest that you add Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby league to your watchlist. A recent discussion took place on the talk page and we've decided to not put those new Grand Final scorecards up for the reasons listed there. As for the dashes in the scorelines, could you use the "–" coding (click edit this section to see the code) with no spaces instead of "-". Greatly appreciated. If you have any further questions please feel free to do so on the project's talk page. Cheers, mdmanser 05:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Could you please confirm that you got this message? One of the guys in the project will being to remove those new boxes anytime soon - so don't worry about making any more because they are going to be phased out. mdmanser 09:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Penrith Panthers History[edit]
A tag has been placed on Penrith Panthers History requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. скоморохъ ѧ 05:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
There their there[edit]
There's a difference between "there" and "their" and your edits are consistently wrong in the usage you employ eg "There" might be a new club record in 2008 if the Roosters beat "their" previous highest points tally.-Sticks66 12:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Please be more careful when updating Template:2008 Super 14 Table as you did here.
- Crusaders got a bonus point for scoring 4+ tries and thus went to 10 points
- You didn't update the Reds' games played from 1 to 2
- I don't know why you were changing the team links but Sharks (rugby union franchise), Bulls (rugby league franchise) and Cheeters (rugby union franchise) are all incorrect.
Cheers! --Stormie (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of New Zealand Warriors History[edit]
A tag has been placed on New Zealand Warriors History requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <3 bunny 00:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of History of the St. George Illawarra Dragons[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article History of the St. George Illawarra Dragons, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- All issues below (needs copyediting, needs expanding, needs expert attention, not of neutral point of view, too short in length, and unreferenced), Is perfectly acceptable on St. George Illawarra Dragons article.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 07:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)