User talk:SSSRVsegda

SSSRVsegda, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The

Adventure

Hi SSSRVsegda!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Maxima Group, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the conspiracy theory, the supermarket was probably bombed.90.244.88.190 (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

August 2014[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 02:24, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SSSRVsegda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here to build an encyclopedia. Wikipedia needs to cover all view points, not ignore those which the Latvian government and its agents find convenient to surpress. I was bloked after a kangaroo court in which I had no say. Several users including the ip above and even Xil who lied to have me bloked admit that my view point is a perfectly valid one and that it is one which many believe in. I should be unbloked immediately. SSSRVsegda2017 (talk) 15:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia does not publish original research on conspiracy theories. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.