User talk:SSt001

SSt001, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SSt001! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello, I'm Chewings72. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chewings72 (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citing free webhosts

In this diff it looks like you are adding a statement sourced to a WordPress blog -- please be careful to read WP:RS and WP;V, and make sure that your additions conforms to policy.

Donald J. Harris

Here, I've reverted your recent addition to the Donald J. Harris article. It looks like you were intending a useful addition to the article, but I didn't find support in the source you cited for the assertions you made. This may be nitpickey, but the African Americans article says that the term African American generally denotes descendants of enslaved black people who are from the United States. Harris is a naturalized U.S. citizen but, as I understand it, he is descended from African slaves and Irish slaveholders in Jamaica. Also, I didn't see any mention of his grandmother in the source you cited. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:47, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald J. Harris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your edit to The Revolution Betrayed has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. RolandR (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Classical Marxism. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. In this edit, and others to several articles, you are either adding completely unsourced material, or (as here) misrepresenting what the source cited says. RolandR (talk) 19:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Leon Trotsky, you may be blocked from editing. Despite previous reminders, you persist in adding text without citations to support what you write. Please stop doing this, and make sure that other readers can look at the sources themselves to confirm the accuracy of your edits. RolandR (talk) 10:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramón Mercader

You have now been reverted by three different editors at Ramón Mercader. We have tried to explain on the talk page what is wrong with your edits, but you have nonetheless persisted. I strongly encourage you to not edit the article directly again, but instead propose your changes on the talk page so that we can work together to achieve consensus. Rublov (talk) 11:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will just add that I have had to revert two of your edits at the4 article on the Ice axe for inadequate command of English which has not enhanced the article, and for too much detail which seemed irrelevant (or WP:OR) there. I suggest that the best approach for you to contribute to Wikipedia in future would be to make your points on the Talk Page of the relevant article and seek consensus (agreement) on the best sort of content to change. Thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC) Nick Moyes (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patenuade is wrong. Photos show quite clearly that that the Trotsky murder weapon was a mountaineering ice axe, not a common pickaxe. I reverted you at Pickaxe. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]