User talk:Renamed user 1569823497

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:STJMLCC)

O== STJMLCC, you are invited to the Teahouse! ==


Teahouse logo

Hi STJMLCC! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hutchinson Middle School‎[edit]

Hi STJMLCC,

You'll probably have noticed that I just made an edit to Hutchinson Middle School‎. I'd like to explain this edit for you:

I added a tag saying "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." I know this is true, because you told me. This links to "conflict of interest", a term I explained before. I'm not saying there is a conflict of interest, just that there is a potential one. This also ties in with What Wikipedia is not, specifically the part "Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion".

I also uncapitalized the section titles (preferred; see this) and removed surplus references in one section -- since they were all to the same source, one, at the end, stands for the whole paragraph.

Thank you. Eman235/talk 03:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ema235, if you noticed I did not remove the tag regarding my contributions merely the tag regarding citations as I fixed those issues this morning. I just have a habit of capitalizing titles, I appologize if I was annyoing you with my habit.

Right, that's fine. By the way -- you should sign you posts on talk pages. This is easy to do by typing ~~~~ after your post; this will automatically turn into your signature when you save. Example: Eman235/talk 03:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lumia 520 8.1 Update Release.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lumia 520 8.1 Update Release.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.noknok.tv/2014/05/23/discover-whats-new-in-windows-phone-8-1-for-your-nokia-lumia. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Indrek (talk) 11:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lumia 520 8.1 Update Image.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lumia 520 8.1 Update Image.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.phonearena.com/news/AT-T-rolls-out-Lumia-Cyan-and-Windows-Phone-8.1-for-the-Nokia-Lumia-925-and-Lumia-520_id58868. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Indrek (talk) 11:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lumia 520 images[edit]

In addition to the licensing problems as described above, I wanted to point out that neither of the images you added to the Nokia Lumia 520 article actually seemed to depict the Lumia 520. Specifically, I believe the first image shows a Lumia 930 (note the speaker grille and front-facing camera) and the second one a Lumia 1520 (note the overall size and the positioning of the navigation buttons). In addition to ensuring that you actually have permission to use the images you add to Wikipedia, please also verify that they actually depict the subject of the article. Thank you. Indrek (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks, but it is still a work in progress. I have yet to discover the date it was opened and a few other sections need to be made such as demographics. ಠ_ಠ (talk) 00:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing talk pages[edit]

Hallo, please have a look at WP:TALK and note that it's OK to edit your own talk page (except for removing certain notices), and it's OK to edit or remove comments you've added to other talk pages before anyone else has replied to them, but you must not remove conversations to which other people have contributed. Thanks. PamD 08:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hutchinson Middle School for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hutchinson Middle School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hutchinson Middle School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 16:33, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ash yellows[edit]

Hello. I have undone your move, and returned the "ash yellows" article to its original capitalization. The correct and most common form of the name in publications is not capitalized, nor are any of the other "yellows" plant diseases ("aster yellows", "elm yellows", etc.). I hope this is useful information to you. fish storm (talk) 20:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you my research showed that it was spelled differently. I must have missed the alternate spellings.

Sincerely, STJMLCC (talk) 20:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ash Rust Eating A Tree.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ash Rust Eating A Tree.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Indrek (talk) 20:35, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Living Strong Television Network, STJMLCC.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This page is clearly unsuitable for inclusion.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

I was unaware that the page was previously deleted. I apologize for the disconvenience/bother on such a splendid and wonderful Saturday. I hope you enjoy the rest of your, hopefully uninterupted Saturday, and the remainder of your Weekend!

Thanking you for notifying me of this issue and wishing you a great weekend,

STJMLCC (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol[edit]

We appreciate your enthusiasm but please do not patrol or curate new pages until you have significantly more experience and are thoroughly familiar with our inclusion policies and guidelines and deletion procedures. If you need any help please do not hesitate to ask me. Thanks --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:41, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When you have more experience, when patrolling new pages and listing them for deletion, you will certainly want to read this policy, which is interesting because we have a very efficient technical tool for finding out. Such users are then blocked and their creations deleted. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Ash Rust Eating A Tree.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:35, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RCA Tablets[edit]

FYI, The RCA article is about Radio Corporation of America, later renamed RCA Corporation which existed from 1919 until 1986 when its was broken up. Any material about RCA branded products produced after 1986 belong in the RCA (trademark) article. Technicolor SA owns the RCA trademark and Venturer Electronics makes RCA branded computer tablets as shown at the URL [1]. Steelbeard1 (talk) 15:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me about this issue. I was unaware of the facct that there were two RCA sites. I will look into this ASAP. I will fix any other misleading issues. STJMLCC (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suzuki[edit]

Hi, I saw your recent edits to Suzuki and wanted to offer some comments about them:

  • In this edit you changed a number of wikilinks to loom to piped form. That's not necessary - per MOS:PIPE, plurals and other similarly derived forms can be written with part of the word outside the square brackets, and it'll still render correctly as part of the wikilink. Please avoid trivial edits such as this that don't actually improve the article.
  • In this edit, in addition to the same wikilink changes as above, you wikilinked the word "Loom" in "Suzuki Loom Company". Per MOS:LINK, you shouldn't link part of a name or term, especially when the link leads to a completely different article.
  • In the same edit you also removed the phrase "That was wishful thinking.", labelling it as "Users Mentioned Opinion" in your edit summary. Perhaps you didn't notice that it was actually part of a verbatim quote from a cited source. Needless to say, the text of a direct quote shouldn't be changed without a very good reason.
  • In this edit you removed the word "outstanding", calling it a peacock term. Perhaps you didn't realise that in that particular context, "outstanding" means "remaining", not "remarkable" or "exceptional" (which would indeed be peacock terms).

I've fixed these (and a few other minor) mistakes, and I'd like to ask you that you review your edits more carefully in the future. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me. Thanks! Indrek (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your help. I appreciate all of your editing, but that link was already linked to another site I merely fixed the final destination and display of the link. As for the Peakock terms, I must have misread. Thank you for all of your help and assistance, STJMLCC (talk) 19:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template tags[edit]

G'day mate. This edit to that template added DIV tags but didn't close them. I've added them but wherever that template has been substituted, it will impact on user talk pages, boxing all subsequent content into those tags. You might want to have a look at where that has been added in recent days to check for errors. Cheers, Stlwart111 03:50, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your assistance I will personally look into the matter immediatly. Have a goodnight and enjoy your holidays,
STJMLCC (talk) 04:07, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No worries mate. It's only been a few days so it shouldn't be a big problem and most people don't seem to {{subst:}} the template anyway. Stlwart111 04:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Again Enjoy Your Evening And Happy Editing,
STJMLCC (talk) 04:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC) (Ps. Forgot To Colon My Previous Signature Thanks For Fixing That)[reply]

Microsoft Outreach Newsletter Issue 5, December 2014[edit]

WikiProject Microsoft Newsletter - Want to opt-out?
Issue 05 – December 2014

Project News in bullet points.
Current Collaboration Article

The current article we are working to improve is Microsoft, and the aim for this page is to expand it, revert vandalisim, and verify certain information that has become inaccurate over the years. The editor that has the most edits and improvements to this page will earn a barnstar of their choice. The second and third person will also earn one, but one that is pre decided.

Member News

Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Participants

Lack of members!


From the Editor

Help is needed for the job of putting future Newsletters together. The present incumbent is finding it difficult to reflect the breadth of the Project, focusing on much the same individuals and articles each month, and has decided to beg for contributions from other individuals. Interested persons need only start working on next months issue to qualify. It really is that simple!

If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!


Editing This Newsletter

Edit This Page At Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Outreach/Newsletter

Contributors to this Issue
To-do List

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Thanks to Wikipedia: WikiProject The Beatles for the design.


Interview for The Signpost[edit]

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Microsoft

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Microsoft for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (spout) @ 17:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Microsoft[edit]

I just found it via Wikipedia's Microsoft portal. Was fairly easy to find actually. Anyway, I'm glad to be part of WikiProject Microsoft. I'm actually a member of WikiProject Video games too. :D Kamran Mackey (talk) 23:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Kamranm1000: Excellent! I figured you might have found it through the portal!... I probably should utilize that more often I have pratically disregarded it since becoming coordinator of WikiProject Microsoft. Well, It's great to have you aboard! Thanks for your help and assistance,
STJMLCC (talk) 23:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays![edit]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello STJMLCC, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

Microsoft Outreach Newsletter Issue 01, January 2015[edit]

WikiProject Microsoft Newsletter - Want To Opt-Out?
Issue 01, Febuary 2015

Project News!
  • Please use the template {{subst:JOINWPMICROSOFT}} to invite users to our WikiProject. Note that {{subst:JOINWPMICROSOFT}} signs your post automatically.
  • Once a user has joined our WikiProject please welcome them by using the template {{subst:Microsoftwel}}.
  • We need more members! Invite as many editors (who are working on Microsoft related articles) as you can! Use the above mentioned invitational template on the user talk pages of possbile members!


The current article we are working to improve is Microsoft Word, and the aim for this page is to expand it, revert vandalism, and verify certain information that has become inaccurate over the years, as well as gaining more attention as any and all changes have been either unconstructive or by a singular user. The editor that has the most edits and improvements to this page will earn a barnstar of their choice. The second and third person will also earn one, but one that is pre-decided.

Member News

Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Participants

Lack of members!


We had a great 2014!

2014 Was a great year let's make 2015 an even greater year! We need to pick up speed and get going! 2015 Will be our come-back year!


From the Editor

Help is needed for the job of putting future Newsletters together. Interested persons need only start working on next month's issue to qualify. It really is that simple!

If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of WikiProject Microsoft. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!


Editing This Newsletter

Edit This Page At Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Outreach/Newsletter

Contributors to this Issue
To-do List

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Thanks to Wikipedia: WikiProject The Beatles for the design.
Mass Message Delivery by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MMS[edit]

I tweaked the header of Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Outreach/Newsletter, when transcluding an entire page to other's talk pages, it is best to take care with header levels. Take a look at the updated version to make sure I didn't break anything on you! Happy editing, — xaosflux Talk 16:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles are already tagged for Microsoft project[edit]

Hi.

I noticed you added WikiProject Microsoft tags to Windows 98 and Windows 95 talk pages while they already had a tag. These new tags are not needed.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 04:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From what I know those were WikiProject Microsoft Windows not our WikiProject. I added these to hopefully raise awareness of our actual spectrum (as it includes all Microsoft technologies) and raise awareness of our job in Wikipedia and possibly attract new members. Thanks for notifying me enjoy your evening,
STJMLCC (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this reply is what I was afraid you might give. Please look at this code from Talk:Windows 98.

{{WikiProject Microsoft|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Software|class=B|importance=Mid|computing-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Microsoft|class=B|importance=High|windows=yes|windows-importance=Top}}

Top line is what you added. Bottom line is what already was there. Both add the page WikiProject Microsoft.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 11:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but the third line does not link you to WikiProject Microsoft, it merely links you to WikiProject Microsoft / Windows. I may very well be wrong, but this is what I beleive to be correct. Thanks,
STJMLCC (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, it does link to WikiProject Microsoft. Codename Lisa (talk) 04:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

USS Theodore Roosevelt[edit]

With this edit, you reinserted 11 external links that are known to be broken. How is this helpful? Note that the links are not used as references in the article.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the case, you should have stated that in your summary. In case you missed it, this falls back on your head for note implementing a proper summary. Good day to you,
STJMLCC (talk) 00:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "avoid broken links" don't you understand? I notice that you have made no attempt to fix the broken links even afteryou have been told That they were broken. It is therefore clear to me that you want the links to stay broken for some reason.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I expected you to fix that yourself immediately after you saw my response, clearly I was wrong. Rather than tacking the proper course of action and fixing it yourself or posting on the article talk page after reading my response, you decided to rant on about a simple mistake. If you continue to rant on about this, I wish you to know I may leave no response. However, as a response to your ignorant persistence will fix it myself. I also wish you to know this is a User Talkpage and that article based discussions, such as this one, belong on an Article Talkpage. Good Day,
STJMLCC (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:29, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers[edit]

Hi Renamed user 1569823497,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, STJMLCC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Renamed user 1569823497. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Escalona Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Mirada High School Logo & Mascot.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:La Mirada High School Logo & Mascot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:45, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]