Jump to content

User talk:SZ1999

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, SZ1999, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

SZ1999, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! SZ1999, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Jai Chhathi Maa (March 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SITH (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
TonyBallioni (talk) 16:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SZ1999 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi Admins, I just got to know that I'm blocked for abuse. I promise I abused nobody on this entire Wikipedia. you can check my contribution history. I did not abuse anyone. All I'm doing is tagging & AFD. I request you to unblock my account so that. I can continue using Wikipedia

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK and have not addressed this in your request. Yamla (talk) 17:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SZ1999 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, My previous requested is rejected due to WP:SOCK I just checked what SOCK is. also checked my user page. it's been mentioned that some User:Abhishek4889 is the person who is blocked. and you think I'm Abhishek and I'm pretending to be Shubham (SZ1999) well I can provide you my official Government ID. photo clicked not scanned. my name is Shubham Zine. And I don't know who Abhishek is. why would I pretend to be Shubham if I'm Shubham? I read the checkuser article it says it works through IP address. currently, I'm in Mumbai and using wifi of Hathway Broadband. which is mostly used by every other neighbor. so I don't know how this exactly works but I know one thing I'm not that user I've been blocked for 'ShUbHaMXTalk 17:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you send us a photo of some official government ID, we have no way of verifying that it's your ID. Even if we accept that, we can't tell whether it wouldn't also be the ID of the person behind User:Abhishek4889 and the various socks. So that won't help. You'll have to address the overlap in technical evidence and behaviour. Huon (talk) 22:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.