User talk:Saadaantipas

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Saadaantipas, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Arabic; did you know there is an Arabic Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

مرحبا بكم![edit]

أهلا و سهلا، و مرحبا بك في ويكيبيديا! الجهود لتحسين ويكيبيديا تُقبَل و لكن للأسف الشديد مساهماتك لم تُكتَب بالإنجليزي في جودة عالية بما يكفي لتكون مفيدة. يبدو أنك تعرف اللغة العربية؛ هل تعرف أنه يوجد ويكيبيديا بالعربية؟ يمكنك التفضل بالمساهمة هناك. على كل حال، مرحبا بك في المشروع و شكرا جزيلا لجهودك! إن كنت تحتاج إلى أي مساعدة فاتصل بي في صفحة نقاشي. ‎-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)‎[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Saadaantipas, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Saadaantipas, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 07:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Saadaantipas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Saadaantipas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 07:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saadaantipas (September 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

The submission appears to be written in Arabic. This is the English language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Arabic Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saadaantipas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actually i am a researcher and journalist who is interested as a hobby to publish articles about people whether they are famous or not. the current article is abouk EKH. tommorow maybe about a personality from peru or australia... i just have fun in doing research on the internet, collecting data and posting it on the internet including social media, wikipedia...as for the accusation of promoting this personality or advertising, actually i dont know this person or met him, the only link is the data found on the internet through newspapers and blogs...

i am not a spam or person trying to carry chaos on wikipedia or post false information. all the info posted is correct and linked to references and sources.

for all this the indefinite block is not correct and does not depend on proof that the article is bad or spam or advertising. Saadaantipas (talk) 16:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saadaantipas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actually i am a researcher and journalist who is interested as a hobby to publish articles about people whether they are famous or not. the current article is abouk EKH. tommorow maybe about a personality from peru or australia... i just have fun in doing research on the internet, collecting data and posting it on the internet including social media, wikipedia...as for the accusation of promoting this personality or advertising, actually i dont know this person or met him, the only link is the data found on the internet through newspapers and blogs...

i am not a spam or person trying to carry chaos on wikipedia or post false information. all the info posted is correct and linked to references and sources.

for all this the indefinite block is not correct and does not depend on proof that the article is bad or spam or advertising. Saadaantipas (talk) 16:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Hello, Saadaantipas. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft : Received passport has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, and on IRC chat. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elseddik Khalifa Haftar has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elseddik Khalifa Haftar. Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 13:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elseddik Khalifa Haftar (September 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elseddik Khalifa Haftar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 13:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actually i am a researcher and journalist who is interested as a hobby to publish articles about people whether they are famous or not. the current article is abouk EKH. tommorow maybe about a personality from peru or australia... i just have fun in doing research on the internet, collecting data and posting it on the internet including social media, wikipedia...as for the accusation of promoting this personality or advertising, actually i dont know this person or met him, the only link is the data found on the internet through newspapers and blogs...

i am not a spam or person trying to carry chaos on wikipedia or post false information. all the info posted is correct and linked to references and sources.

for all this the indefinite block is not correct and does not depend on proof that the article is bad or spam or advertising. Saadaantipas (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Elseddik Khalifa Haftar[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Elseddik Khalifa Haftar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 14:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Hello, Saadaantipas. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 14:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actually i am a researcher and journalist who is interested as a hobby to publish articles about people whether they are famous or not. the current article is abouk EKH. tommorow maybe about a personality from peru or australia... i just have fun in doing research on the internet, collecting data and posting it on the internet including social media, wikipedia...as for the accusation of promoting this personality or advertising, actually i dont know this person or met him, the only link is the data found on the internet through newspapers and blogs...

i am not a spam or person trying to carry chaos on wikipedia or post false information. all the info posted is correct and linked to references and sources.

for all this the indefinite block is not correct and does not depend on proof that the article is bad or spam or advertising. Saadaantipas (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elseddik Khalifa Belqasim Haftar[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elseddik Khalifa Belqasim Haftar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Liz,

I actually read your comment very carefully but did not understand the reasons for speedy deletion. actually this person is a public figure very important in his home country and abroad. did you have the chance to check the internet before deciding that it needs speedy deletions. i work on wikipedia since 20 years and i find articles about all kind of people. i need you to check the internet very well before making this decision of speedy deletion. any answer should be build on reason and proof and not personal opinion or decision.if you don't know a certain public figure does not mean he is no famous or worth writing about. it is impossible to know all people. mother earth is formed of 8 billion citizens.

thank you for your cooperation.

best regards. Saadaantipas (talk) 16:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actually i am a researcher and journalist who is interested as a hobby to publish articles about people whether they are famous or not. the current article is abouk EKH. tommorow maybe about a personality from peru or australia... i just have fun in doing research on the internet, collecting data and posting it on the internet including social media, wikipedia...as for the accusation of promoting this personality or advertising, actually i dont know this person or met him, the only link is the data found on the internet through newspapers and blogs...

i am not a spam or person trying to carry chaos on wikipedia or post false information. all the info posted is correct and linked to references and sources.

for all this the indefinite block is not correct and does not depend on proof that the article is bad or spam or advertising. Saadaantipas (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Bbb23,

I read actually your message very carefully but still did not really understand the reason for indefinite block. the personality subject of the article is actually very famous in lybia and abroad around the world. did you have the chance to at least check the internet for info about dr. elseddik khalifa belqasim haftar. he is very famous and know for his support. it is necessary for readers to know details about this public figure. can you please explain the meaning of term advertising or promotion. all information written in the article is simple and gives a glimpse about this public figure. i did not promote his image for presidency or a certain post. i searched wikipedia and found many articles talking about people who maybe not public figures.

i appreciate receiving a clear clarification about the reason for the above steps.

best regards. Saadaantipas (talk) 16:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saadaantipas (talk) 15:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actually i am a researcher and journalist who is interested as a hobby to publish articles about people whether they are famous or not. the current article is abouk EKH. tommorow maybe about a personality from peru or australia... i just have fun in doing research on the internet, collecting data and posting it on the internet including social media, wikipedia...as for the accusation of promoting this personality or advertising, actually i dont know this person or met him, the only link is the data found on the internet through newspapers and blogs...

i am not a spam or person trying to carry chaos on wikipedia or post false information. all the info posted is correct and linked to references and sources.

for all this the indefinite block is not correct and does not depend on proof that the article is bad or spam or advertising. Saadaantipas (talk) 16:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]