Jump to content

User talk:Saeedkhanbozdar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Saeedkhanbozdar (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #22580 was submitted on Sep 07, 2018 09:33:24. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 09:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saeedkhanbozdar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hellow sir please unblock my account because the other person create a multiple accounts with my name so please kindly unblock my account and this is my real and personal account other accounts are not mine you can delete or block other accounts I hope you unblock my account as possible as do So please kindly unblock my account, sir, Thanks

Decline reason:

The investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saeedkhanbozdar786/Archive showed that there was technical evidence confirming all those accounts as the same, so you'd need to explain how that can be possible if, as you claim, some unknown other person created the other accounts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Declined unblock requests need to be retained while the block is in effect so that subsequent reviewing admins can see what has already happened. I've restored the UTRS one above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saeedkhanbozdar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hellow sir Because in the office we used to work together the same laptop which computer did i ever use and which of my friends ever Because the timing of that office working in that day and there were some other people who used to work at night and now I don't know who has made multiple account with my name I have no fault in this if you have to block, then you can block the rest of the users who are not at all they are throwing Please unblock my account there is my no fault Only tell me what should I do now

Decline reason:

Given the overlap in interests, this is WP:MEAT at best. There are no grounds for lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • So you're claiming that multiple people in your office registered accounts with very similar usernames to yours, and they all used those accounts to create articles about you? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Declined unblock requests should not be removed while the block is still active (as I already explained above), as other admins will need to see them. I have restored them now. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saeedkhanbozdar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sir please tell me what i do please unblock me im not wrong please give me one chance

Decline reason:

First of all you explain why you created several accounts. We do not believe you when you deny it. Then explain why you told us that the accounts were not yours. Then ask for the standard offer. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:37, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • My suggestion is that you should be totally honest about all of those accounts, and then follow the WP:Standard Offer procedure and don't make any edits (from accounts or not logged in) for at least six months - and then make a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Saeedkhanbozdar (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: You are blocked directly. Read and follow the advice given by Boing! said Zebedee above. Further, pointless unblock requests will result in your talk page access being revoked. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]