This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Broadcom
This edit is completely unacceptable. If someone objects to your move request, the next step is to file a RM, not file a new uncontroversial request and hide the old one. I will be requesting a revert of your move. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 00:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand what happened. A disturbance in the force maybe? The request I removed had my sig on it so I assumed it was misplaced. Strange assignment of authorship on Wikipedia Go ahead and do whatever you want but understand no malice was intended. Talk toSageGreenRider 01:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
BTW, what's wrong with making Broadcom a disambiguation page? There are now two Broadcoms: the old Broadcom Corporation and the new Broadcom Limited (formerly Avago). Talk toSageGreenRider 01:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
I read the edit history and re-read the RM instructions. I realize what happened now. To me it looked like my request ended up in the wrong (from my point of view) subhead by an invisible hand that I thought was a technical glitch, which I "corrected." The process at RM is opaque because you moved my vote from one ballot box to the opposite one with no visible authorship (except in the complicated edit history). I boldly added a step to the process there to made it clear who is proposing what and who is objecting. hth. Talk toSageGreenRider 13:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
