User talk:Sakaton

I like wikipedia.

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Health services research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to De-identification may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to De-identification may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Death Index, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Health informatics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 18:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

On Conflict of Interest and autobiography...

Hello, Sakaton. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 18:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trialome

The article Trialome has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence at all of notability; appears to be a term coined by one academic, Vojtěch Huser. This Google Scholar search appears to show that no-one else is using it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

ad refspam as my contributions: I contribute to wikipedia out of good will. With taxpayer money I reserach medical topics and want to give the knowledge to the public. I am not glad that some see it as refspam. I made many edits that improve the topic. Please put you contributions to the topics (links to your articles) next to mine. Please explain for each link - how exactly they are spam before making such claim. --Sakaton (talk) 14:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

ad email contact: please send an email directly to me. Your statement is false that you emailed me. You only emailed my boss and he dismissed it as spam. I don't know whether JLAN is the same as the email. You did not sign your name. Please introduce yourself. --Sakaton (talk) 14:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

OK, I have no idea what you are talking about, or if you are talking to or about me. I have not sent you email, nor have I mentioned email anywhere here as far as I know. By the way, if you want me to know that you have mentioned me, you should use my full username, not an abbreviation.

I also have no idea who your boss is. But it seems to be time to ask you this: do you have any connection, personal or professional, with Vojtěch Huser? Because if you do, you are strongly advised not to make direct edits to the article about him or to the article about his project. You are of course welcome to suggest edits on the talkpages of those articles, as long as your suggestions are supported by reliable third-party sources.Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Trialome for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trialome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trialome until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Example of basic summary results available at ClinicalTrials.gov.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Example of basic summary results available at ClinicalTrials.gov.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)