User talk:Salimfadhley/Archives/2020/September

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate Shemirani (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kate Shemirani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kate Shemirani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 21:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Salimfadhley! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lapablo (talk) 21:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Steele and Shemirani

Thank you for starting these drafts. I've done some work on Steele. Hope that's OK - feel free to discard whatever isn't useful. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC) PS I am confident more reliable sources will publish about both in the coming weeks and the "lack of significant coverage" objection to Shemirani is likely to become out of date so the draft can be considered again. I'll keep my eye out! Steele's coverage is clearly not inidental, so he should be approved when the draft is ready. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks BobFromBrockley, I appreciate your work in improving these articles. Regretably, I feel that the editor's decision regarding Shemirani was correct. There is not enough coverage about here. I feel that the article about Steele is probably ready to be moved into main-space. --Salimfadhley (talk) 17:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

I agree! BobFromBrockley (talk) 07:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for submitting. Might be worth mentioning this in this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_over_responses_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic#United_Kingdom (which currently doesn't mention the 5G angle people) and this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation_related_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic#5G_mobile_phone_networks BobFromBrockley (talk) 09:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Steele (conspiracy theorist) has been accepted

Mark Steele (conspiracy theorist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Salimfadhley (talk) 09:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Salimfadhley! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I cite a newspaper publication archived in the British Library?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate Shemirani has been accepted

Kate Shemirani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Salimfadhley (talk) 19:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Surnames

Surname pages don't need notability to be shown and are quite common as per the surnames category. I'm referring to Swargiary which I just accepted. SL93 (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dsouzaron/sandbox

Thanks for your comment. The subject has a road named after him. Does't that sound notable to you?

I replied via the article's talk page, @Dsouzaron: --Salimfadhley (talk) 01:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft : CitiusTech

Hi Salimfadhley, Thank you for sharing details with me. Yes I went through both the articles Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) and Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest as suggested by you. [Draft:CitiusTech]] comes under conflict of interest but I don't either work or represent the organization directly. My friend works in the organization and he helped me with relevant information as required. That is how I am connected to this organization. Hence I have disclosed it on my user page about it. I have tried to keep information factual with appropriate references. Request you to kindly check and let me know your recommendation on required edits or if there is any other concern. As this is my first article, I am really looking forward for feedback. Reshmapaul18 (talk) 06:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Let's talk about this subject on the draft's talk page not my personal talk page, thanks @Reshmapaul18: - Go here instead -> Draft talk:CitiusTech --Salimfadhley (talk) 07:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Draft:BrazyXay. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bike Shed Motorcycle Club has been accepted

The Bike Shed Motorcycle Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Salimfadhley (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry, @Praxidicae: I misread the situation. Thank you for reverting my talk page comment. It was inappropriate. --Salimfadhley (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Conspiracy theorists

I don't think I knew of your work before even though you're not a new editor. It's possible that I've been stating the obvious when thinking so earlier as you invited me to review the Shemirani article. In any case, I think that you're doing good work and I thank you for it. One thing I was surprised about was that unless I missed something you ultimately reviewed and moved articles to mainspace (after some assessment, like mine). While I've done WP:NPP I never was involved at WP:AFC and am not sure if it's common practice. I understand that anyone can do it and that the possible consequence is CSD/AfD where relevant. I'm personally not a great content creator and have mostly cleaned up and improved existing articles. As I believe in collaborative work I never requested the autopatrol right and also decided to submit to AFC a recent article I wrote, then realized that it may take forever for it to be reviewed. As Shemirani made the news and that people were likely to search for her on WP (some obviously did and even vandalised or ranted, your predictions accomplished), it was a good move... I was even more surprised when I saw the pics were really yours from a live event. Congratulations for that, —Paleo Neonate – 19:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

I've been on Wikipedia for a long time, and have found myself drawn to the ineffable gravity of fringe topics. There's a lot of work that needs to be done, so I would encourage you to become a patroller. You can only do good. AFC is the new NPP, I think. But please beware you will spend much of your time rejecting articles about insignificant software companies and Indian vloggers. We do what we can. Yes, I was at the 19th September protest - here's some fun audio I recorded. I had a notion to edit up a short audio documentary but I haven't got round to it. Thank you for the kind words. --Salimfadhley (talk) 22:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@Salimfadhley: Did you take any photos of Piers Corbyn and Mark Steele? If so, the photos could be used on the articles about them.--LeftiePete (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Photos of Mark Steele are on Wikimedia Commons, help yourself. I did not stay late enough to see Piers Corbyn - the crowd was getting restless and I began to be concerned for my own safety. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

c:Category:Mark Steele (conspiracy theorist) --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic#United Kingdom. Thanks.--LeftiePete (talk) 22:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)