User talk:Salmoonlight

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An historic

Please stop changing an historic to a historic. It's not an error. Masterhatch (talk) 18:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ONUS

Hello. This edit violates WP:ONUS. Please self revert. Dovidroth (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ONUS is not for things you simply disagree with. Your personal feelings should not be used as a source. And regardless, you still never reached a consensus on the talk page. Salmoonlight (talk) 21:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Onus states that "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content". As such, as long as there is no consensus, you many not include the controversial text in the article. Dovidroth (talk) 07:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Indigenous peoples. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dovidroth (talk) 12:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I got it the first time, you don't have to ping me again. And I haven't tried doing anything since that IP reverted me. How about you go on their talk page too? Salmoonlight (talk) 12:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected the message. I apologize if it pinged you twice. Dovidroth (talk) 12:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

I see that you have made a large number of minor edits to establish your ability to edit restricted pages, but you do not appear to understand our NPOV and Verification policies, among others. Please study those policy pages and also WP:BRD. When an edit is challenged by reversion, it should be brought to the article talk page to determine whether there is consensus to reinstate it on the article page. If you edit-war or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia, your account may be blocked from editing.
SPECIFICO talk 16:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing in this topic for months now. Salmoonlight (talk) 16:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit statistics show that your significant participation in this area began much more recently. But at any rate: Everyone, regardless of tenure on this site, is required to follow our Policies and Guidelines. And per the notice above this is particularly important and critically enforced on pages designated as relating to Contentious Topics. SPECIFICO talk 00:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On npov tag in 2023 Israel-Hamas protests in the US

Hey salmoonlight :). So I saw you removed an npov tag I added [1]. So I opened a talk discussion and there pointed out several problems which were not addressed and which you did not reply too. Can you please restore the tag until we sort out the problems? From what I know one is usually supposed to answer in the talk and explain the removal. I imagine you did not notice the discussion that I opened. Would you like me to send you a link? Homerethegreat (talk) 18:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Salmoonlight. Thank you for your work on Concordia Township, Des Moines County, Iowa. Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please continue to develop the article. The USGS is not enough. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 01:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Salmoonlight. Thank you for your work on Jackson Township, Des Moines County, Iowa. Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please develop the Iowa stubs. Articles need more than the USGS as a reference.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style information

Hello Salmoonlight, I because of this edit to Salicornia rubra I think you may not have seen the Wikipedia Manual of Style section on what generally should not be linked. It is generally a good idea to avoid linking commonly known places, people, etc. like United States in most articles. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred mountains categories

Like all categorisation in Wikipedia, the addition of a category requires the article to have verified (appropriate cited) information that justifies that categorisation. I notice you are adding sacred mountain categories to some mountains in Queensland where there is no information in the article about the mountain being sacred or that claim is made but is uncited. So can you please ensure that the cited information is available in the article before categorisation. It is probably worthwhile being clear to whom it is sacred. Thanks 23:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC) Kerry (talk) 23:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Launch titles has been nominated for deletion

Category:Launch titles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:1RR at Al-Rashid humanitarian aid incident

At topics related to the Israel-Arab conflict, editors are restricted to one revert every 24 hours: An editor must not perform more than one reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

In the past 24 hours you have made two reverts:

Please self-revert 00:14, 3 March 2024. Further, please remember that the NPOV template should only be removed when the conditions to do so are met. BilledMammal (talk) 00:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Salmoonlight. Thank you.

Finding consensus at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza

Hey, thanks for pitching in at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza. More attention on the subject can help the community come to a reasonable decision. But I noticed the input you provided is based on your personal analysis of the subject. This type of input can be counterproductive, because consensus on Wikipedia should be based on reliable sources and policy-based arguments. In the case of a page move, arguments should be based on what the subject is explicitly called in reliable sources, not what individual editors understand or determine it to be. Personal interpretation or analysis is generally given little to no weight when determining the results of the discussion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing

I see you are deleting spaces before stub tags. There should be two spaces before the stub tag. See: WP:STUBSPACING. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 22:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted several of your edits regarding spacing before stub tags. Please don't delete that 2nd space. Masterhatch (talk) 12:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Salmoonlight is indefinitely topic banned from making edits anywhere on Wikipedia regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned per consensus among uninvolved administrators at this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sacred says who?

A month ago you were queried about Australian sacred mountains - now Indonesian - have you a source for the assertion? WP:RS = ??? thanks. JarrahTree 11:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created the Indonesia category because they were already categorized as sacred; I was simply diffusing the main category. Salmoonlight (talk) 19:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - thanks for your answer, the problem being that where the trail starts or ends, the likelihood that the category is based on allusion rather than sources verifiable... cheers JarrahTree 12:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kapildui moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kapildui. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Urola Kosta moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Urola Kosta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 07:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sacred mountains of New Zealand

Regarding your newly created Category:Sacred mountains of New Zealand, what is your inclusion criteria? I’m concerned that it will either end up filled with almost every mountain in the country, or will be excessively subjective. And it’s very likely to be woefully under-filled for a while at least, if we only fill it based on current article contents, to the point of being misrepresentative. — HTGS (talk) 23:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sacred lakes

Semi-related: how are you assessing the addition of lakes to this category (Category:Sacred lakes)? I noticed you added Lake Tikitapu (the Blue Lake), which does happen to have the word tapu in it, but is generally not regarded as sacred. However, I’m not sure if you meant to add Lake Rotokākahi (the Green Lake), which is currently tapu. I’m hesitant to add that one though, just because I don’t have a great understanding of how exactly sacred-ness is considered, and tapu in many cases may not mean quite the same thing. — HTGS (talk) 02:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, a quick search for “Rotokakahi sacred” gives “The lake is … considered tapu or sacred”[2] so that’s easy ;) — HTGS (talk) 02:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's honestly been so long since I went on that spree with sacred natural sites that I don't really remember my criteria for those categories, sorry. For Lake Tikitapu though, I presumably added it based off of the first paragraph in its history section. Salmoonlight (talk) 03:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

similarly

The category - Sacred mountains of Indonesia The sacred mountains of Indonesia - any memory as to the criterion? Tourist information that is created in Indonesia has some very enthusiastic phrases for sites in Indonesia. Interestingly the lead paragraph of the Mount Lawu article has it identified as one of the eighteen sacred mountains of Central Java’’ I am still trying to track things to do with that claim...… It would be interesting if there are any clues as to why items got included from your point of view. JarrahTree 15:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything in the lede about it being sacred as you describe, but I probably added it based off of the Religious significance section. Salmoonlight (talk) 05:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fourth Treaty of Prairie du Chien, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sac. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of traditional territories of the Indigenous peoples of North America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algonquin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect use of sections tag

The tag should only be used if the article is sufficiently long. This article, like many stub and start articles, is short enough that it is fine with just one section [3] And honestly, sections are not difficult to add so you should consider just fixing the issue you identified—if adding sections would be a genuine improvement, not the case if each section is just one paragraph—rather than drive by tagging it. (t · c) buidhe 14:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Category:Kidnapping of children by Nazi Germany, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chauncey Green (talk) 09:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is this jerk Chauncey Green, pretending to fight vandalism by vandalizing pages s/he has no stake or interest in ??? There seem to be quite a few people affected. We should report him/her. Peteruetz (talk) 09:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The admins have dealt with him now. I've struck the false warning. A^♭m ^(Ring!) _(Notes) 14:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rak of Aegis moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rak of Aegis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

thank you for your contributions!! :D xRozuRozu (t • c) 21:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Urola Kosta

Hello, Salmoonlight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Urola Kosta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Covert canvassing and proxying in the Israel-Arab conflict topic area and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, BilledMammal (talk) 04:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

An historic

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

WP:ONUS

Edit warring

Introduction to contentious topics

On npov tag in 2023 Israel-Hamas protests in the US

I have sent you a note about a page you started

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Manual of style information

Sacred mountains categories

Category:Launch titles has been nominated for deletion

WP:1RR at Al-Rashid humanitarian aid incident

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Finding consensus at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza

Spacing

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

sacred says who?

Kapildui moved to draftspace

Urola Kosta moved to draftspace

Categories

Category:Sacred mountains of New Zealand

Category:Sacred lakes

similarly

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Incorrect use of sections tag

August 2024

Rak of Aegis moved to draftspace

A cup of tea for you!

Concern regarding Draft:Urola Kosta