User talk:Salutti

"Human shields" = There is a great difference when one uses the enemy or when one uses own civilians, women and kids.

Gaza and West Bank[edit]

The use of own civilian population[edit]

Arab Palestinians have been using their own kids as human shields to deter Israel's humane army [1] since the early years of the Palestinian Intifada, [2] [3] a consistent pattern since the outbreak of the terror war in October 2000 of Engineering civilian casualties [4] [5] or Why Palestinian children die already in November 2000 Israel cried out to UN: Keep Palestinians from using kids as shields [6] [7] & U.S. doctors decried: Palestinian intifada abusing children regarding to :Who is responsible for the civilian casualties during the intifada? [8], finally Palestinians admitted to it [9]. Here’s a video showing how the palestinians use children as human shields and have them perpetrate terrorist acts themselves [10].

Using enemies' population[edit]

reversed to previous version + added link about US doctors, Malik continues senseless ABUSE back and forth without any explanation and/or logic?

Salutti (talk) 20:58, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's more from a doctor's words, I omitted the clear criticism he had about the Palestinian society, etc. I just cited the plain data related to the article.

In a medical magazine in 2004, a doctor wrote about values of societies and about

Palestinians using their children for cannon fodder, intentionaly placing them in harms way

[11]

Salutti (talk) 22:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Human shield. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Malik S. I did not "add" anything, I quoted only what has been said with sources, thank you.

Salutti (talk) 22:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Salutti for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 22:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not check my IP, now, If we know each other that's a different case. Did I accuse "Malik Shabazz" of being sockpuppet of "Rracecarr"?

Salutti (talk) 23:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear that User:NormaLisa is your account, and it has been blocked indefinitely. You may not use alternate accounts to avoid WP:3RR, or to give the appearance of consensus where there is none. Take this as a final warning. Kevin (talk) 01:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The so called "evidence" is another POV by Malik that of course has already an agenda, I said, I do not deny I know other wikieditors but that account is not mine; Why do I need another additional if I am content with this one?

Confirmed by checkuser. see also Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MarthaFiles - Alison ^❤ 06:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]