User talk:Samesex Marriage78

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Samesex Marriage78, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Shared IP[edit]

[1]

Just make few dozens of good edits in articles, and you’ll become unbound from any hell occurring at your IP, at least if this concrete account will not demonstrate any WP:signs of sock puppetry. Blocks on IPs are usually WP:SOFTBLOCKs, and even if will not be the case, then you can apply for the flag which allows to edit from blocked IPs. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Incivility will get you blocked on Wikipedia. Mind your language. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 16:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A word of advice[edit]

Stop making it worse with Arctic Kanagroo. I don't have time to deal with it, but you keep cursing at him and you will be blocked and his revert of your post will be in vain. I suggest you let it be for right now. It will be re-added later if you don't get yourself blocked. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks against another editor. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samesex Marriage78 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, I'm sorry about the cursing. I just got a little hot under the collar because of Artic Kangaroo's unnecessary reversions of my comments on a third party's talk page. I am sorry I cursed, and it won't happen again. I learned my lesson.

Decline reason:

I see no indication that you're here to constructively contribute, rather you appear to be a sockpuppet and/or troll account. Either way, your behavior in the first few edits is reason enough to leave you indefinitely blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 17:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins, I suggest you look at this diff. Toddst1 is reverting this user's post on Toddst's own talk page. But one thing I would like to mention, is that I did not warn him prior to reporting, but I just told him about it and who knows, he was already blocked before I posted that note above. If he is willing to change, I don't see any reason to ~~accept~~ reject his unblock, but could he change his username? Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 16:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reason above does run hollow: Toddst1 reverted the edit first - which means "it's been read; don't re-add it". AK appears to merely be a talkpage stalker who rightly removed it again when it was re-added. If someone is going to get "hot under the collar" when someone else actually "plays by the rules", then Wikipedia might not be the best place for them. I see no need to change the username - they're welcome to advertise their current relationship status/preference - as long as it does not violate the username policy (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- This is a CU block of a well-known troll. That is all I have to say about that. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 18:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]