User talk:Samsagregorsamsa

José Antonio Pamies is a spanish poet and writer. He was born in 1981.

Published books:

- «En el umbral del día», I International Poetry Prize Málaga, Ciudad del Paraíso, Fundación Málaga, 25 poems collection, 2019.

- «Diario nómada. 326 estaciones», II International Poetry Prize of the Círculo de Bellas Artes de Palma de Mallorca, homage to the poet Miguel Ángel Velasco, published by Sloper, Minerva collection, 2014.

- «Afonías»,among the finalists of the XXVI Gerardo Diego Poetry Prize for new authors, published by LapizCero Ediciones, 2013.

- «Campos de Hielo», Ediciones Babilonia Cultural Association, 2012.

Concern regarding Draft:José Antonio Pamies[edit]

Hello, Samsagregorsamsa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:José Antonio Pamies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:José Antonio Pamies[edit]

Hello, Samsagregorsamsa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "José Antonio Pamies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please undeleted the Draft:José Antonio Pamies so i can continue working on it Samsagregorsamsa (talk) 23:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: José Antonio Pamies (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hammersoft were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:José Antonio Pamies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 02:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samsagregorsamsa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hammersoft (talk) 02:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: José Antonio Pamies (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:José Antonio Pamies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 08:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: José Antonio Pamies (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hammersoft were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The one link you've added is a dead link. Please stop resubmitting this draft without substantially improving the article, especially with reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:José Antonio Pamies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 19:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]