User talk:Samsiq

Welcome!

Hello, Samsiq! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! VikingDrummer (talk) 04:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Electron density contributions

Hello, Samsiq. I have removed your recent addition to Valence electron because of several serious issues that need to be addressed:

1. The whole section you added reads as figure caption. This may be suitable for a journal article, but not for an encyclopedia.
2. The placement as the first section is also problematic. Together with your only interest in adding this material to en.wiki articles (1, 2) it points to a possible conflict of interest and WP:REFSPAM. Are you one of the authors of the cited study, or anyhow connected with the authors?
3. The electron counts per orbital were in both articles wrong: sp² hybrid orbitals need 1+2 electrons.
4. Not much is known about the technique. How is the cross-section of graphite obtained? How deep does the beam penetrate? How many atoms and bonds are imaged in every pixel? Parts of your contribution are unreferenced, is this WP:OR?
5. There are few other experimental methods that can visualize valence electrons in a material. Your addition is based on a primary source, so it is hard to judge its notability. Do you know of any secondary sources that can help us establish its importance and notability.

Sincerely, Ponor (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Electron cloud densitometry (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Electron cloud densitometry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Electron cloud densitometry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:53, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Samsiq! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:53, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Graphite. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Electron cloud densitometry has been accepted

Electron cloud densitometry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wikipedia needs secondary refs and to focus on mainstream ideas, especially for articles on topics popular with lay readers. I suspect WP:REFSPAM is also important for you to read. DMacks (talk) 14:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Electron cloud densitometry

The article Electron cloud densitometry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article so deeply based on predatory sources (e.g. doi:10.11648/j.ajac.20200804.11) that it cannot be salvaged, and at best must be WP:TNT'd.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Electron cloud densitometry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electron cloud densitometry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electron cloud densitometry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)