User talk:Samsunge100
Lorna Fitzgerald
[edit]Hi, I was wondering if you had a photograph of Lorna Fitzgerald (that you have taken yourself) to illustrate the article, since Wikipedia's policies do not allow the use of copyrighted images for articles on living people. Joshua Issac (talk) 23:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Samsunge100
[edit]User:Samsunge100, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Samsunge100 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Samsunge100 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Samsunge100! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 725 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Monique Williams - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Katie Griffiths for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katie Griffiths is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Griffiths (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010Talk 21:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)