User talk:Samurai1882

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Dear Samurai1882: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! Thanks! Glen 17:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leung Ting[edit]

	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to Geocities in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. --Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 04:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your recent edits[edit]

	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to an internet forum in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. --JoeSmack ^Talk 05:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

	You recently added an external link to an internet forum in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. If you continue in this fashion, you may be blocked from editing. --Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 05:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wong Shun Leung[edit]

Greetings! You obviously have much knowledge of Wong Shun Leung and have made many significant contributions to the article. I happened to run across the article randomly, and spent a good hour or so trying to tighten up the writing in the lead section of the article. I was quite disappointed to return to the article today only to see all of my editing work having been reverted. Please understand that Wikipedia is designed to be a collaborative process, and that nobody "owns" any article. As I stated at the beginning, you obviously have much to contribute here -- please allow others to contribute in their own fashion. Constructively speaking, the article needs a complete re-write to become encyclopedic. Feel free to continue to add content, but don't revert the efforts of other editors (such as myself) who attempt to improve the article by copyediting. Thanks. OscarTheCat3 04:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, either I was looking at the wrong diff or someone reverted the reversion...either way, I see now that my contributions are still in the article. My apologies to you if I accused you incorrectly. OscarTheCat3 04:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While your depth of knowledge and amount of work on Wong Shun Leung is admirable, the article needs a little cleanup to fit Wikipedia. There are far too many external links, with the reference list numbering 100 links (many being cited multiple times). The article should probably be compacted a little, as well as using a more formal markup following Wikipedia's guidelines. Also, take care in citing sources; forums and small hobby sites are often not encyclopedic sources, and as such shouldn't be cited in a Wikipedia article. Citing references is a good thing, but this has become unwieldy. For a guide, take a look at the somewhat related article Jackie Chan. It is better organized, being detailed but not overly so. Remember, we welcome your contributions to Wikipedia. Mazin07^C₪_T 00:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding any more sources please read: Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability, a lot of the sources you have added do not fit these criteria, including some of the recent additions replacing {{fact}} tags I have reverted these you may want to replace some others. --Nate1481 22:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]