User talk:Sandy Anugrah

December 2020[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. BegbertBiggs (talk) 01:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm EN-Jungwon. I noticed that in this edit to Miss Universe 2016, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EN-Jungwon 09:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Miss Universe 2017. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Miss Universe 2016. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Universe 2018. Larry Hockett (Talk) 01:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 01:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Rio Dewanto

added links pointing to Best Actor in a Supporting Role and Best Supporting Actor

Atiqah Hasiholan

added a link pointing to Wonderful Life

Raihaanun

added a link pointing to Badai Pasti Berlalu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cut Mini[edit]

Hello Sandy Anugrah,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cut Mini for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 10:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donny Damara[edit]

Hello Sandy Anugrah,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Donny Damara for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 10:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

Disambiguation link notification for December 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Atiqah Hasiholan

added a link pointing to Wonderful Life

Christine Hakim

added a link pointing to Cinta Pertama

Didi Petet

added a link pointing to Best Actor in a Supporting Role

Donny Alamsyah

added a link pointing to Best Supporting Actor

Joko Anwar

added a link pointing to Satan's Slave

Meriam Bellina

added a link pointing to Get Married

Raline Shah

added a link pointing to Best Supporting Actress

Reza Rahadian

added a link pointing to Best Supporting Actor

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User Sandy Anugrah not responsive to warnings, not editing collegially. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 12:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for lack of sources, lack of edit summaries and lack of communication. You need to take more notice of the warnings you get.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 13:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for immediately resuming the same activity after the previous block lifted. I suggest you start using edit summaries and communicating. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]