User talk:Sanjeev4125

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sanjeev4125!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mumbai CSMT - Sainagar Shirdi Vande Bharat Express. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Misterrrrr (talk) 13:42, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Misterrrrr
I was about to add the sources. Please undo this. Sanjeev4125 (talk) 13:43, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ Sanjeev4125 add sources and submit it via AfC --- Misterrrrr (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Misterrrrr
I just added the sources. Kindly let me know how to submit via AfC Sanjeev4125 (talk) 13:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
add {{subst:submit}} to the article, on the top. reviewers will review it. --- Misterrrrr (talk) 13:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Misterrrrr
Thanks for your help. Sanjeev4125 (talk) 14:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RPSkokie (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sanjeev4125! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RPSkokie (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script[edit]

Information icon - Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Silk Institute metro station, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kandivali West metro station, you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not add Indic script to our articles, but have continued to do so, please stop. If you revert text that includes Indic script, you should remove it - Arjayay (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goregaon West metro station for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goregaon West metro station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goregaon West metro station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 09:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bangur Nagar metro station for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangur Nagar metro station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangur Nagar metro station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Timothytyy (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andheri West metro station for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andheri West metro station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andheri West metro station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Timothytyy (talk) 04:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of train stations[edit]

Please note that, like most other subjects, train stations are expected to meet WP:GNG before an article on them will be accepted into the encyclopedia. This means providing multiple secondary sources that describe the station itself (not just the train line it is on) in significant detail. signed, Rosguill talk 20:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Vande Sadharan Express route diagram templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Liz,
That category page has been created since the new type of train's route will be launched in few days from today (31/10). Kindly request you to remove the speedy deletion tag. Once I get more information, I'll be making new page for those train routes and their route diagram templates will be added. Hope to hear from your side soon. Thanks Sanjeev4125 (talk) 05:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Vande Sadharan Express trains indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced information[edit]

Wikipedia works on "verifiability, not truth" as a guiding principle. This policy states that “Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. That we have rules for the inclusion of material does not mean that Wikipedians have no respect for truth and accuracy, just as a court's reliance on rules of evidence does not mean the court does not respect truth. Wikipedia values accuracy, but it requires verifiability. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image licenses[edit]

I've noticed that you've added several professional images to articles that you had previously uploaded to Commons, for example here and here, which include images that were previously widely published under incompatible licenses. You've also marked these as "own work". If you are indeed the original artist and have somehow retained license in all cases, you'll need to carefully follow the process at WP:DONATEIMAGE. If these are not your original works, please stop immediately and delete the images from commons. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]