User talk:Sanskrita3000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Julia Allison[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sanskrita3000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Julia Allison, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 18:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have received no compensation for these edits. I notice that there are gendered edits that are potentially damaging to biographies of living women - please see Taylor Lorenz's work on this subject. Sanskrita3000 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying that you have received no compensation for those edits. But that does not address the concerns voiced by User:Thriley that you might have a conflict of interest otherwise. Are you able to confirm that you have no relation to Julia Allison in the sense of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline? If that is not the case, you are strongly advised to avoid editing the article directly.
What's more, in your edit summaries (e.g. [1][2]) you have been making vague allegations of WP:BLP violations but have consistently failed to explain concretely what consist in concretely. (Regarding e.g. the second of these two examples, I can already confidently tell you that it is *not* a violation of "Biography of a living person standards" if the article doesn't namedrop famous clients of a media agency that Allison has been involved in, or does *not* extol a particular ad campaign as "massive". Please read WP:NOTPROMO and WP:PEACOCK.)
You said you are "Happy to discuss", which is great. Please do that on the article's talk, addressing the arguments that other editors have brought up there and in this edit summary.
Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]