User talk:Sapphire1000

Welcome!

Hello, Sapphire1000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 20:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for work on Saga of the Skolian Empire

On behalf of myself and the Kindness Campaign, I'd like to present this barnstar to Sapphire1000 for awesome edits on numerous Saga of the Skolian Empire pages. Congratulations, and thank you! ♥ JamieJones ^talk

I should have looked more closely - why did you merge away so many pages? Can you quote a Wikipedia policy? I worked hard so that the terms would be searchable for someone reading the books, once they get to the category. Please explain. JamieJones ^talk 22:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

----------

Hi JamieJones! Thank you very much for your Barnstar. I tried very hard to create good Skolian Empire pages with lots of useful info. Hopefully this could make people who dont know the series curious.

Well, the reasons for merging pages were various:

1) After browsing for a while on Wikipedia, I found out that such fan-made pages about books, TV-series or films (particularly when they do not have that many Wikipedian fans) are not very liked by some Wikipedians, especially when they actually make up a cathegory consisting of many smaller articles. Some such pages are even threatened to be deleted, or forced to merge, with deleting many information. So I got scared that this may happen to our Skolian Empire as well someday. Merging little stub-articles into larger ones is in my opinion hopefully a way to avoid this.

2) Some pages had really very little information (like Triad, ISC, SSRB, Escomm etc.). They were extremely small stand-alone-pages (stubs), which would better suit in a large article, where the text from them looks very good and is more useful. Some of them vere even "orphaned articles" with no links leading to them (Quasis, I think) and are now valid and useful members of a larger article.

3) Some pages had information that were very similarly repeated on other pages (Dyad - Triad or Aristos - Taskmakers - Providers). Existence of such cross-topic pages lead to the fact that one and the same matter necessarily had to be explained again and again, sometimes even with the same words (Dyad - Triad). I believe it is better for a reader, when he/she can find for example in article "Eubians" everything about Eubian society, military, history etc. The information is in one place, instead of being scattered into several different places which would force a reader to search much longer for the wanted information.

I tried to link every created sub-page so that a reader will jump directly at this sub-article. For example the link to "Aristos" will lead you directly to the sub-article "Aristos" in the main article "Eubians". This way your intention to enable every reader to search out the correct terms should be preserved, I hope. When a person searches directly for a term in Wiki-search, it is of course found immediately, without problems.

Sapphire1000 on 25. March 2007, 18:45

Articles for deletion nomination of Dyhianna Selei

I have nominated Dyhianna Selei, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyhianna Selei. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 08:10, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Taquinil Selei

I have nominated Taquinil Selei, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taquinil Selei. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 08:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Eldrinson Althor Valdoria

I have nominated Eldrinson Althor Valdoria, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eldrinson Althor Valdoria. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 08:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sauscony Lahaylia Valdoria Skolia

I have nominated Sauscony Lahaylia Valdoria Skolia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sauscony Lahaylia Valdoria Skolia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 08:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ruby Dynasty

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ruby Dynasty. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruby Dynasty. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of Eubians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eubians, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eubians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]