Jump to content

User talk:Sarafina212079905

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Sarafina212079905, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

The Polytechnic of Namibia project page for the Information Competence course is here: Wikipedia:School and university projects/Polytechnic of Namibia. Please leave your signature there so that we know which user name belongs to which group. Make sure you are logged in when working on your assignment (Check the top-right corner of your browser window, your user name should appear there). If you haven't created an account yet, please do so here.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or your tutor — We're happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Need help?

Additional tips...

Sarafina212079905, good luck, and have fun. --Pgallert (talk) 08:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


SAVE FOR OLD AGE[edit]

The shenanigans at the biggest pension fund in the country – the GIPF [Government Institutions Pension Fund] – have created the mistaken impression that Eldorado has (again) revealed itself in our lifetime. Recently,Lawrence Ihuhuna , secretary general ofNBWU as well as the Public Servants’ Committee, made the accusation that employers loot the pension funds[1] of the employees and that they also want in on the gravy train. The problem is that you cannot have your cake and eat it too. A pension fund is not a cash loan and the rules for its administration are set out in the applicable law. And let us state this unequivocally: pension funds are there to provide benefits for their members upon their retirement[1] .

WHO BROUGHT UP THE PENSION FUNDS[edit]

Pension funds, in our country, are regulated in terms of a 56-year-old Act, the South African| Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956[2] , but Namibia has not kept up with the amendments that South Africa has made after our independence. In terms of the said Act, the beneficiaries of the funds are solely the employees. However, both the employer and the employees have a vested interest in the health of the fund. For this reason, they are entitled to jointly appoint trustees who manage the investments of the funds.

we should not encourage members of pension funds to dip into their savings now. we should teach them sound financial habits of setting aside, in a regular and standard fashion, part of their income for old age when they are no longer working. I do. You should as well. Because only the rich can live off their investments and other incomes

REFERENCE[edit]

  1. ^ a b TSUDAO, GURIRAB. "SAVE FOR OLD AGE". Namibian. Retrieved 03 October 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  2. ^ TSUDAO, GURIRAB. "SAVE FOR OLD AGE". NAMIBIAN. Retrieved 03 OCTOBER 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)

[1]

Sarafina212079905, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Sarafina212079905! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 02:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Reason for the influx of Namibia editors?[edit]

Greetings, I've noticed a lot of new Namibia aritlces coming out? While this is great to see overall, as our Africa coverage could really use improvement, I'm curious as to what the reason for this is. Has some university started assigning Wiki articles as coursework? Had some club or institution decided to focus on improving Namibia coverage?

I'd greatly appreciate it if you could hit my Talk button and message me with any insight. If there's an organised effort to get Namibians contributing, we can probably put a welcoming committee together to make sure everyone's getting the support they need. Thanks for any insight! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sarafina212079905. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Sarafina212079905/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]