User talk:Sarr Cat/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Mauer
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Alex Mauer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster talk 14:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:4-energia logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:4-energia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Daylen (talk) 02:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of Nymphaea cultivars
Hello, Sarr Cat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Nymphaea cultivars".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Tanglu concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tanglu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Ajit V. Pai, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 02:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Bilby (talk) 03:05, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Sarr Cat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked by User:Bilby because they suspected my account to be compromised. This is not the case, I am still in control of it. I'm going to assume it was assumed to be compromised since I have made many constructive edits in the past, and then suddenly went and vandalized Ajit Pai's article. No, it wasn't some hacker (and it certainly wasn't "my little brother" Quite simply, reading news about Pai's plans to not only gut net neutrality at the federal level, but also to order states to scrap plans for their own net neutrality laws pissed me the hell off. In that moment I decided it was a bright idea to screw with his Wikipedia page for a laugh at his expense. Not the most effective form of protest... but it was amusing to me in that moment. In hindsight I think the block was definitely justified, the edits I made were stupid and I shouldn't have done them. I don't however, want my entire account and edit history locked away because of a dumb thing I did. If I get a block for awhile for acting like a screwball and insulting a politician I don't like because they are about to gut net neutrality, that's fair. But my account is not compromised, so that reason for my current indefinite block is not fair. Edit: I just realized, you may need some form of authentication to verify that my account is not compromised no? Can you can use the email address that is associated with my account for that? I'm assuming admins at least, can see that. If I need to have a confirmation email sent that's fine. SarrCat ∑;3 03:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Well, this is the best unblock request I've seen. Thanks for being honest.
I'll leave it to the blocking admin. Don't recall the process of the top of my head for confirming you have control. @Bilby: will need a look-see in any event. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
So, it really was you, so now everything's fine?
No. Do you realize that because of your relatively large number of edits, your vandalism to a trending BLP article went unnoticed for over 10 minutes, and was being screenshoted and Tweeted? I'm by no means a supporter of Pai, but you don't need to let your personal opinions overwhelm you to the point of vandalism. Last election, I absolutely despised Trump and Clinton. Did I vandalize their articles? No. --AmaryllisGardener talk 19:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
discretionary sanctions alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Sarr Cat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Tanglu
Hello, Sarr Cat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tanglu".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Intel xeon inside.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Intel xeon inside.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)