User talk:Saruman IV

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Stephen Bloom , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monster of Aramberri[edit]

Sorry for my bad English, I mean that currently no known pliosaur exceeds 17 meters in length. By the way, someone translate this article for the Spanish wikipedia, but the information was too sensationalist. I´m fixing the Spanish version, from the French version. That's more accurate and have scientific references.--Rextron (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kittens[edit]

Thanks. I decided after having to put my cat of 17 years to sleep 2 years ago that I didn't feel like getting another one to get attached to, but I guess this little one will be okay. :-) Nightscream (talk) 03:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also here to say thanks. Where did you get all these cute photos of kittens? Much more interesting on a talk page than barnstars which only editors who've edited Wikipedia b4 it existed get! DontClickMeName _talk ^{contributions} 16:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cognatic[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I just noticed this article Cognatic appears to be a stub that consists of nothing more than a definition. From WP:NOTDIC, it seems like something that belongs on Wiktionary, but doesn't necessarily warrant its own Wikipedia article. What do you think?

It's certainly a stub, but I think it passes the useful test in WP:STUB:

"The distinction between dictionary and encyclopedia articles is best expressed by the use–mention distinction:
A dictionary article is about a word or phrase and will often have several different definitions for it

An encyclopedia article is about the subject denoted by the title but usually has only one definition (or in some cases, several definitions that are largely the same) but there may be several equivalent words (synonyms) or phrases for it."

JohnCD (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm still learning my way around these policies an such, and I don't think I would have found that on my own. Saruman IV (talk) 19:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]