User talk:Satthepbienhoa

This is Satthepbienhoa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seamless Steel Pipes (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia can't source itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seamless Steel Pipes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 04:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satthepbienhoa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 04:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello Satthepbienhoa. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Satthepbienhoa. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Satthepbienhoa|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen328 (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Team,

I am writing to address the recent issue regarding the block on my account. I want to clarify that the content I have contributed, including information about steel pipes, was not intended as promotional material. My goal has always been to provide accurate and valuable information to the Wikipedia community.

I understand that there may have been concerns regarding the nature of my contributions. I assure you that my intent was to share relevant, well-researched information and to enhance the content on Wikipedia. If there are specific aspects of my contributions that need adjustment or if there are guidelines I should follow more closely, I am more than willing to make the necessary changes.

Please reconsider the block on my account, and let me know if there are any specific actions I need to take to align with Wikipedia's guidelines. I am committed to adhering to the community standards and contributing positively to the platform.

Thank you for your understanding and support. Satthepbienhoa (talk) 09:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A few things:

Please do not write using AI tools; we want to hear from you, not from AI.
If you wish your appeal to be seen by an administrator, you need to format it as instructed in the block notice above.
I have provided some suggestions for what you need to do, at the AfC help desk. You may wish to at least read them, even if you're no longer able to enact them, now that you've been blocked.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing to respectfully request a review of the block placed on my account. I understand that there were concerns regarding my contributions and the use of AI tools. My primary intention has always been to provide accurate and relevant information, particularly on the topic of steel pipes, to support and enhance the content on Wikipedia.

I assure you that my contributions were meant to be informative and beneficial to the Wikipedia community. If there were any specific issues with my edits or if they did not meet the guidelines, I am fully prepared to address and correct them.

To comply with the block notice instructions, I will add the following template to the bottom of my talk page:

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Satthepbienhoa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Your proposed new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines and am willing to make any necessary adjustments to my contributions. My goal is to provide valuable information and support the community. Please advise if there are specific changes I need to make.

Decline reason:

There are. See WP:USERNAME, WP:COI, and WP:PROMO, which you were meant to have already read before making this unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reviewed the suggestions provided at the AfC help desk and will make the necessary improvements to my contributions to align with Wikipedia’s standards.

Please let me know if there are additional steps I need to take or if there are further details required for the review process. I am eager to resolve this issue and continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia. Satthepbienhoa (talk) 09:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to propose your new username in the blue request box above, please, otherwise I doubt this is heading anywhere. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]