User talk:Saustin1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Saustin1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Metastorm, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Metastorm[edit]

A tag has been placed on Metastorm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help request[edit]

{{helpme}} looking to "userfy" deleted page.

The information on how to request the userfication of a deleted page is at Wikipedia:Userfication. Either ask an administrator in the category Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles to copy the deleted article's text to a user page for you, or make the request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao ^talk 13:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help request 2[edit]

{{helpme}} Userfication http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Saustin1/Metastorm

Your question? Chzz ► 18:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

looking to userfy and have page accepted to Wikipedia. Thanks! Saustin1 (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help request 3[edit]

Looking to userfy Metastorm article on my page for wikipedia publication. Saustin1 (talk) 14:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite sure what you are asking for, since the article is already userfied here. Do you want someone to check the article to see if it's ready to be moved into article space? Tim Song (talk) 14:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please, I'd like someone to check to see if it's ready. Thanks! Saustin1 (talk) 16:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: The deleted page has already been copied into your user space; it is in User:Saustin1/Metastorm. Chzz ► 14:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you make any changes from the deleted version? I can't find any changes in the page history. The little ®s are not helping. Our Manual of Style has more on style issues, and our neutral point of view policy explains the ground rules. In general, we need reliable, third-party, published sources, such as news coverage. The company's product line may be relevant, but right now the article looks like an ad. You can use our article on, say, Microsoft Corporation as a rough guide. The bottom line is: no, I don't think it's ready. If you are working for this company, you'd probably want to read our conflict of interest guidelines and our organizations FAQ as well before continuing working on this. Tim Song (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]