User talk:Scandinavia ... Word!

гражданско выход ) :( :o :> <>

Semblances of Sovereignty[edit]

I have read this article, and I cannot figure out what the subject is. Is this a summary of a book? Is it an article about a period of history? The whole thing is entirely confusing, seems like a stream-of-conciousness list of a variety of unconnected facts. I was tempted simply to nominate it for deletion, but I thought I'd ask what was going on first. --Russ (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This will help, Talk:Semblances_of_Sovereignty, Best Regards, (Scandinavia ... Word! (talk) 18:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Word! Best Regards, (Scandinavia ... Word! (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Its Pytch.. Hon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. - Jehochman ^Talk 17:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Semblances of Sovereignty

A tag has been placed on Semblances of Sovereignty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DAJF (talk) 15:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too late now, i m not planning to write this article again, It all came too early.
I will contact User:R'n'B to see if I can recoup all the information that was lost, Regards, (Scandinavia ... Word! (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Semblances of Sovereignty[edit]

I think your article was deleted to the fact of a patent issue in regards to the title of your article which bears a resemblance to the title an actual/notable book in the US market. Also, the titles of your sections swindled against a mirror of connotations from the postmodern era making your article highly idle to deletion by wikipedian administrators. In response to their action, I am now starting an article based on the actual book. Keep in mind the following bullet points when building your next new article:

Refrain from using distorted/garbled/swindling language styles
Educate yourself as you write a proper article swiming parallel to actual/current/past history events of the time not against
Titles; avoid indirect advertising (mirrors/doubling) with others
Avoid streaming-of-consciousness or narrative writing; use references
Avoid exploitation of political/social events
Smooth Hierarchy from end to beginning
Avoid false portrayals ors impression
Give deep insight about culture and society; again: REFERENCES and do not plagaerse
Enlight and Educate others; invite other people to join the progress of your article
Omit jumbled structures and distorted composition which adds more to the incertitude of the article you are writing
Be creative, i know you have excellent copy writing skills, but your TITLES added more commotion to the subject rather than notion
Facts, Hardwork, Long hours of thinking, YES, long hours, until wiki turns itself into a dietary suplement for not getting overloaded with FAT.
Agian, EDUCATE YOURSELF with FREE THOUGHT, KNOWLEDGE and consilience
Be intelligent and never speculate rather than explaining the points of views of different sources.
Overall, your first article was confusing and polorizing. Probably by the Bafflement of your Titles for every single entry or section.

Sorry for your loss, in hope of, hope you have a copy of it, LoL (Lew Basnight IV (talk) 21:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

in response of to Semblances of Sovereignty deletion[edit]

Delete as either nonsense or original research. I cannot tell what the author of this page intends; it appears to be a collection of text snippets copied out of other articles, with no apparent connection among them. If nothing else, the article should be deleted for using both "rootless cosmopolitan" and "jetset" in the introductory paragraph to describe Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Russ (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G1. It may be long, but it is still unsalvageable nonsense. --DAJF (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete appears to be grammatically correct sentences that don't actually mean anything, as if the nouns were just dropped in at random. Very weird. I could just be misunderstanding what's going on here so I won't speedy delete personally. --W.marsh 15:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I find this very hard to believe. Your reasons for deleting this article are totally antisemetic, Respect and Word Here as in If (film) (Lew Basnight the sixteeth (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Semblances of Sovereignty (book)[edit]

Better now... go ahead with your article. Remember to follow those bullets I have posted. (Lew Basnight IV (talk) 19:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]