User talk:Scavuska

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Lemaroto (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scavuska (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a block edit. Never heard of Lemaroto. I just agreed with the previous edit as the pages had errors.

Decline reason:

At least Likely based on technical evidence. Combined with the editing behaviour, looks like the block is good. Yamla (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scavuska (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Likely can't be a reason to block someone. There's no evidence and is based on a hunch. I'm not that person. Again: just believed the previous edit was right.

Decline reason:

Per below. And do keep this in mind ... this website is, while generally open to the public to edit, still private property. We, the community, set the standards for what evidence a block can be based on. Not those who violate policies and are blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Scavuska (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) This user is an administrator who also has checkuser privileges, meaning he/she can review Wikipedia's technical logs to check if accounts and/or IP addresses are connected to each other, the 'likely' means based on the evidence, your account is likely connected to another one. So in contrast to your request above, there is evidence and isn't on a hunch -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 02:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]