User talk:Schaefer at SCHOTT

This is Schaefer at SCHOTT's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Heinricht (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Heinricht and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank Heinricht, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Schaefer at SCHOTT! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Legacypac (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Frank Heinricht

Hello, Schaefer at SCHOTT. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frank Heinricht".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Schaefer at SCHOTT. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Ariadacapo (talk) 08:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing at Schott AG

Hello. You described your recent edits to Schott AG as "translated from German Wikipedia article". Yet surely it cannot have escaped you that you were reverting to your revision 924920194 from last October (diff), erasing 20 edits that have occurred since, in which multiple issues in your contributions were pointed out and fixed. When you are reverting edits:

You must make it clear that you are reverting
You must explain, at least briefly, why you are doing so
You must be ready to engage in discussion of the controversial edits with other editors.

In the view of this incident, your focus on bringing in always the same content to this article, and generally the terrible quality of your contributions to this article, I urge you to stop your edits to Schott AG: you are not demonstrating at all that you can handle your conflict of interest. Please focus on other topics. Thank you. Ariadacapo (talk) 09:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just don´t understand, why this article, which is a one on one-translation from the german version, is not accepted in the english wikipedia. What i miss, is a concrete and detailled argumentation, which parts of the article are problematic and why. And i have to say, that it´s pretty disrespectful to write about "terrible quality", if you don´t have or at least don´t mention real arguments. Iam ready to talk about these topics, so that we can find a solution. So please let´s focus on the article itself. Thank you for your reply.

Let’s start with sources: please do your homework and bring in high-quality secondary sources instead of press releases by your employer. German Wikipedia is not a high-quality secondary source. Second, monitor the article history: going through it, you will see that many of your edits since May 2019 have been fixed or reverted step-by-step with precise arguments and links to relevant policies. And finally, use the article talk page when discussing controversial topics. Blank reverting to your prefered version, especially when you have a conflict of interest, is definitely problematic. Understand that you are working within a community of editors, whose input you also have to take into account. Thank you. Ariadacapo (talk) 14:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this is an answer i can work with. Now i know where i can find more informations about the problematic parts and how to handle that. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Heinricht (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Heinricht and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank Heinricht, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:14, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thx for your comments Sulfurboy. Am I getting it right, that i have to add more citations, sources to the article? I did that now, but failed to publish the changes. Could you please help me out and tell me, why its not possible to save these changes? Thank you.

So, the changes could been saved. Iam looking forward to your feedback, Sulfurboy.

February 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Heinricht has been accepted

Frank Heinricht, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]