User talk:Scibaby1

Proposed deletion of Miley Cyrus: Wii[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Miley Cyrus: Wii, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No sources provided for WP:V and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 12:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Australia national ice hockey team has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Versus22 (talk) 12:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User:Versus22 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Versus22 (talk) 12:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "User talk:Dolly sarkar"[edit]

A page you created, User talk:Dolly sarkar, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Optakeover ^(Talk) 12:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Dolly sarkar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Merry Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 12:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to User talk:Dolly sarkar. --Merry Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 12:18, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "User talk:Arpanbh 123"[edit]

A page you created, User talk:Arpanbh 123, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. --Merry Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 12:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

I noticed the message you recently left to a newcomer. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. - Kingpin13 (talk) 12:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Miley Cyrus: Wii[edit]

A tag has been placed on Miley Cyrus: Wii, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 13:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miley Cyrus: Wii[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Miley Cyrus: Wii, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I declined the speedy tag but am adding the PROD tag because the article does not support its claims with any sourcing or verification. Please see the following policies or guidelines, WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS. Removal of this tag without correcting the problems will see the article at WP:AFD.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JodyB_talk 14:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]