User talk:Sdsds/Archive Sep 2007

Re: Dombarovskiy[edit]

In my experience, while prose is usually preferred, when it appears that additional data can/should be added that would make such prose bulky and unreadable, lists are the better way to go. Given that more than just the Genesis modules have launched from Dombarovskiy, it seems reasonable that additional missions can be included in this format. Hence, the {{expand list}} template. If you don't like it, feel free to change it back to prose (though I'd suggest a completely new wording as opposed to a simple revert), but I felt this was the better way to represent this particular set of data. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 20:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Williams / Hadfield[edit]

You know, I'm not sure how that got back into the Williams article, about him being the first Canadian lead EVA. Initially, that's what NASA commentators said on NASA TV, but they corrected themselves later, and CapeCanaveral321 corrected the article, here, but somehow it got put back in, not sure who did it, but I can get the reference for it I'm sure. I'll stick it in there and remove that sentence if I find it, and word it in such a way that it is obvious so it won't get reverted again. lol. I don't have a problem admitting I'm wrong, I was going from NASA's PAO folks, so hey, thought they knew those record-holding things. By the way: You rock! Love seeing you edit space stuff. ^Ariel♥Gold 06:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Little Joe 2[edit]

[1] - Yeah sorry about that, I just noticed it was ^{[weasel words]} and took a quick stab at trying to improve it before moving on. Sorry! Scarian ^Talk 14:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

North Oscura Peak[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of North Oscura Peak, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/oscura.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a copyright violation; the original source at http://www.kirtland.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070404-041.pdf is a public domain work. (sdsds - talk) 02:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the article from the copyright problem list, but although the material is public domain, it would be much better if you could rewrite it in your own words. Cheers Kevin 10:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]