User talk:Seacactus 13

Thank you

	Thank you very much
	Thanks for editing and help to fix articles Cycling Team Kranj and Luka Turkulov 🚴🚴 --Livetrackingsamo (talk) 12:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks Galool100 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Seacactus 13 (talk) 22:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

	Thank you
	Thank you very much for your help Bogdan Uleia (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I am proud that you reviewed my articles thanks MagieRouge (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

They are a good source of cashmere!

NinjaWeeb (talk) 13:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

Thanks for reviewing new pages. I am creating articles for Women in Asia contest Oct-Nov-Dec 2020. SWP13 (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hello, Why do you revert vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liu Chang (actor)?. It would help for our discission. He has coverages from Chinese to justify keeping. VocalIndia (talk) 21:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Power~enwiki. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, $NOT, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Thanks for the review of Ella Laboriel article that I began! ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 02:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A question for you

In the page curation toolbar on Lil_Mussie, it denotes that you reviewed the page. Yet in the page curation log, it never denotes that you review the page. Do you know how this could occur? Sam-2727 (talk) 23:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is odd, I'm not sure why that would be. --Seacactus 13 (talk) 00:46, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seacactus 13, ok I unreviewed the page for now. I'm not certain the subject is notable since almost all of the sources are local news coverage. Sam-2727 (talk) 13:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sam-2727. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Lil Mussie, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 13:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thank you for reviewing the page I created. Churot (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Seacactus 13,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Please accept my sincere thanks for reviewing Rajaram Jaipuria. Best regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 18:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Super

I am thankful for your on-the-spot review of Ranchhodlal Chhotalal Technical Institute. Thank you and best regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 05:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Piecegoods

Seacactus 13 Hi! Kindly review the subject page. Thanks and warm regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 11:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seacactus 13 I am sorry to bother you, but i seriously need your help, one user redirected the page to textile. I argued but of no use, and when I added the contents in a section in the textile, it was removed. Kindly help [[1]]. Best regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 08:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was sorted. Thanks for your support. Regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 11:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kayla C. King

I time your review at 16 seconds from when I made the article! Wow!! Is this a record? Many thanks.--MerielGJones (talk) 16:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that is fast, I did even realize that! It was at the top of the new pages when I loaded it so I just went to click the first one I saw. It is definitely at least close to a record. Seacactus 13 (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Seacactus 13, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 11:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

May Holidays bring fun and prosperity to you and your loved ones. Merry Christmas to you.RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 11:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message! Merry Christmas to you also! Seacactus 13 (talk) 15:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing these articles

Since you reviewed one of my recent articles, would you mind reviewing the two the haven't been reviewed yet? The articles are Automate Ads and Sleep tracking. I also left some additional sources in the talk page of Sleep tracking article, so it would be nice if you could integrate those sources into the article while you're at it. Just a suggestion tho. X-Editor (talk) 01:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gläser

Thank you for help in the deletion discussion ;)

DYK ... that the choral conductor Michael Gläser was called in to lead the Thomanerchor in Leipzig when its musical director Georg Christoph Biller fell ill?

I'm going to use him in the strange discussion about how to present German names on the Magnificat I was proud to present to begin 2021. Have a good new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Brown (sculptor)

Hi there. Thanks for all you do on the project. I wanted to discuss this article you moved back from draftspace a short while ago, with the edit summary, "3 sources on a pretty short article is not so few to warrant instant draftify". First, it had been tagged over a month for ref improve, with zero improvement being done on the article, so I wouldn't describe this as "instant draftify". One of the 3 main criteria for Draftify (all but the last which has to do with COI or UPE), is "there is no evidence of active improvement." I think more than a month without improvement qualifies. In fact I feel more than 2 weeks qualifies. Second, while it does allegedly contain 3 references, 2 of those 3 are not valid references, since they don't satisfy WP:VERIFY. So what you have left is his a single valid ref, his obituary, which definitely suggests notability, but alone is not enough, which is why I moved it. Regardless, just wanted to clarify. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, I was not aware, sorry should've looked closer. My bad. Seacactus 13 (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SmartStop riders

Template:SmartStop riders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Craig (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I am an old man and info boxes are too fiddly for my eyes to cope with to create. I am more than happy to read and do the research as it helps me fill my days, but the info boxes and proper citations are beyond me at this stage. Please accept my apologies. I am trying to help not hinder Hildreth gazzard (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some flowey singletrack for you

Thanks for your work on the MTB bios, I hope you enjoy this lush flowey singletrack.Ch1p the chop (talk) 11:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Daumont

Please be careful when creating articles. I noticed on this article you put in the wrong country of birth. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor fix, not a big deal, sorry for minor error . Seacactus 13 (talk) 00:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Hey, when I mention people you’ll never meet fixing mistakes while you sleep - you were very much of the people I was talking about! Lol, and thanks, and sorry https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2021/aug/01/olympics-wikipedia-guy-fraser-tokyo Hildreth gazzard (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the review!!! FlantasyFlan (talk) 05:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello, would you be so kind to write an email to me? Thanks, --Nicola (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's up? Seacactus 13 (talk) 23:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

Hello Seacactus 13,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas, Seacactus 13!
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Have a happy Christmas and New Year

Hello Seacactus 13: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, JW 1961^Talk 11:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you so much for reviewing my new wikipedia pages. I really appreciate it. Weissepedia (talk) 06:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cycling articles

Howdy, just a random as question. So I was editing William Palacio and saw that you had edited it a whole year earlier. My question to you is; Do you use the birthdays function on ProCyclingStats to find pages that need updating or is it quite random? See a very random query because I use that function and I saw your edit a whole year earlier. Anyways I hope you're having a good day, Paulpat99 (talk) 05:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appears I did with that one! Sometimes I will just look at some when I'm bored and then if one needs updating on here, I may do that. It could be a good and somewhat fun way to find random, forgotten cyclists, lol. Seacactus 13 (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vuelta first

Heyo I notice on Dag Otto Lauritzen you moved the vuelta to the 3rd in the list of grand tours stating "Vuelta first is unintuitive". What do you mean by this? These tours are listed in order of date, up till 1995 the Vuelta was the first Grand Tour of the year held April to May. Are you just saying its harder to follow? Regards Paulpat99 (talk)

Oh that's my bad I didn't realize the Vuelta was held first then! I figured they should be in order of date and had completely overlooked that. Feel free to correct that on any I have wrong. Sorry for the confusion. Seacactus 13 (talk) 03:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Algoods I am always learning about the older cycling too. Paulpat99 (talk) 04:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy @Seacactus 13 re this discussion I see you have edited a few pages with GT tables going Tour, giro then vuelta. Just a quick comment to reiterate that pre 1995 it went vuelta, giro then tour. 1995 and after the vuelta moved to the end so now its giro, tour, vuelta. The TDF was never first. Nothing major I just noticed on a few pages you put the tour first. I'm loving the grind your on with those old race pages keep it up! Paulpat99 (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about Danny van der Tuuk

Hello friend, it's nice to see you contributing so much all these years selflessly for cycling wikipedia. I noticed you created an article about Danny yesterday. I previously created the article for him over two years ago, before I was aware of sports notability rules, and hence was deleted shortly after. It has been sitting in my sandbox ever since. The rider has not had any significant steps to be eligible for a page, so is it appropriate for the page to be re-created? LegofanCy (talk) 15:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LegofanCy as per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cycling/Consensus_decisions#Notability_guideline_update a rider who has competed at a cycling monument is deemed notable. van der Tuuk rode the 2022 Liège–Bastogne–Liège finishing in 114th position. Paulpat99 (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paulpat99 You are right! Fair enough then. An issue with notability is, whilst I completely agree with the cretiria on the WikiProject Cycling page you linked, the official sports notability page was updated on 28 March 2022 to allign with Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Sports notability Subproposal 3, which in result eliminated a lot of the milestones that made a rider notable. Do we continue with the WikiProject cretiria or the official ones? LegofanCy (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to go off WP:NCYC. Seacactus 13 (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Matilde Vitillo

Heyo, I'm currently on holiday and received a notification that this draft was not approved because the sources are only parsing mentions. Any way you could have a look at what I did wrong and make any changes. Cheers Paulpat99 (talk) 04:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, from what I have seen, they are far pickier letting drafts through than leaving articles of the same quality created normally alone. It definitely would have had no issues if you skipped the draft step. I will just move it myself before you resubmit it, and should not have any issues. In the future, avoid the AfC process and develop articles in your sandbox, as the whole thing is a pain, especially for those of us who have been around long enough. Seacactus 13 (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes well I found the article as a draft of someone else should I just if i come across a draft like that again just remake the article outside of the drafting process? Apologies for slow reply Paulpat99 (talk) 19:50, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I would do. Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:26, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cycling Team Kranj

Heya Mr Seacactus, so as I was writing on the draft I found out it as the same team as Sava (cycling team) so I moved that page to Cycling Team Kranj I just need help deleteing the Template:cycling data CTK so that i can move Template:cycling data SAK over to it. Cheers, Paulpat99 (talk) 19:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected that template to the sak , that should work. Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Seacactus and Paulpat99 so much for editing. With my understanding of Wiki, every article of mine is doomed :). The club was founded in 1957. The sponsor was the "Sava" tire factory, which was sold to Michelin, and then the sponsorship was lost and the name changed from Kolesarski Klub Sava to Kolesarski Klub Kranj. CT Cycling Team Kranj is a senior semi-pro UCI team, part ov of KKK. It can be read in the Gorenjski museum newspaper with a translator https://www.gorenjski-muzej.si/s-pozrtvovalnostjo-in-predanostjo-do-prvega-kolesarskega-kluba-na-gorenjskem-60-let-kk-kranj/. Mohoric, Mezgec, Polanc, Tratnik......grew up in that club. Thank you again for help Livetrackingsamo (talk) 22:49, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles are good, we just moved the one on Team Kranj into the existing article on Sava which was just very outdated! Seacactus 13 (talk) 03:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award

		The New Page Reviewer Bronze Award
		For over 1,000 article reviews during 2021. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2020

		The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award
		For over 1,000 article reviews during 2020. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2019

		The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award
		For over 1,000 article reviews during 2019. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2018

		The New Page Reviewer's Silver Award
		For over 2,000 article reviews during 2018. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Fisher (cyclist)

Hey @Seacactus 13 I have edited this page to add some prose to the article and some more results. I think this will meet GNG so will remove the template I would like your suggestions to help this article. Paulpat99 (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cool thanks I'll remove it. Could you help out with the Danny van der Tuuk AFD also? Looks like some personal targeting of my pages by this guy, who clearly knows nothing of cycling... Seacactus 13 (talk) 03:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, when I get time later on this evening. I also have some more sources on Fisher to add which should satisfy this comment "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject" Paulpat99 (talk) 07:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Seacactus 13 I have expanded both articles to a level I feel they pass WP:GNG. I am always happy for feedback if you have any. Paulpat99 (talk) 04:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas

Merry Christmas, Seacactus 13

or whatever else you may celebrate at this time of year.

Thank you for all your work on Wikipedia throughout the year

and may 2023 prove to be a happy and successful year for you and your family

Josey Wales^Parley 20:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2022

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2022. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discord invite

Hey there. Congrats on being a very active new page patroller this month. You're doing great. If you want to hang out with other NPPs, consider joining us on the NPP Discord. Discord is text chat/chat room/instant message software that can be really fun. If not no worries. Thanks and see you around :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite, Ill check it out! Seacactus 13 (talk) 06:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Per Christian Münstermann

Dear Seacactus, I would please you to create a English Wikipedia Page for Cyclist: Per Christian Münstermann

He‘s professional cyclist and is currently racing for Saris Rouvy Sauerland Team. 4x times German Champion .

He already got a German Wikipedia page but I’m missing one in English. I would please to create a English version of:

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_Christian_Münstermann

Thanks you very much! 94.121.166.13 (talk) 17:22, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been a bit short on time lately, but I will try to get to it soon! Seacactus 13 (talk) 06:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! I've just seen someone already created a Draft. Maybe it will help and save you some time for publishing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Per_Christian_Münstermann 94.121.173.168 (talk) 14:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is helpful, I will work on cleaning it up and move it to the article space when its good to go.Seacactus 13 (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Well done and thanks for doing most of the 2023 transfers. It takes a lot of time and effort. Thank you, Paulpat99 (talk) 02:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

hi,

Thank you to add my draft to main namespace.

I expanded the page UCI Road World Cup and the single edition pages from 1996 to 2004 (1997 is still unfinished). Please can you revise it? I tried to source everything but maybe I missed some rule about format or style. You can do the modifications alone or advise me and I will do them. Help me on language too please, I am not english mother tongue.

Thank you,

Bye LarryBenjamin123 (talk) 06:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! I will check these out asap when I have time. And no problem, thanks for creating the article! Seacactus 13 (talk) 03:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Awards for 2023

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For doing the 2023 to 2024 cycling transfers on the riders and teams pages. Nice work bud! Paulpat99 (talk) 10:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bad Omens - Finding God Before God Finds Me.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bad Omens - Finding God Before God Finds Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Connor Leahy

Hello, Seacactus 13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Connor Leahy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Seacactus 13,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly review Kwadwo Addaikrom

Boadu_Emma (talk) 006:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)== Kwadwo Addaikrom == Boadu Emma (talk) 06:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS

Thank you very much for reviewing Kwadwo Addaikrom Boadu Emma (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Third-party" tag

Concerning this, that tag has nothing to do with your relation to the article subject (in which case I would tag it with COI or PAID), but with the sources which weren't independent of the subject (e.g. her sponsor, her federation). While such sources can be used for additional information, the basics and most of the article should come from independent, reliable sources. Fram (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see now. My bad, read it too quickly and misinterpreted it. Ill look for more sources that are indepenedent, already added a couple. Seacactus 13 (talk) 15:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of Dave Clark Wikipedia Article

Hi Seacactus 13, I work for business executive Dave Clark, and I'm trying to create a Wikipedia article for him. I see that you are part of WP:BLP, and that you have successfully created several articles for Wikipedia. I'm hoping that you will take a look at the draft I have posted here. Would you consider moving it to main space?

Thank you, Kellyklc (talk) 19:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly Review Kasapin

Your message is highly anticipated. Boadu Emma (talk) 07:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol \| September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]