Jump to content

User talk:Sean William/January 2008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

thoughtful encouragment

[edit]

You are doing well. You are a good editor and admin. Keep it up. Mercury 21:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you just came from a recent DRV of an AFD that I closed, so thanks for the complement. Sean William @ 04:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for editing the arbitration request title to ST47

[edit]

I will make the refrence that the title has been abriviated. Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 06:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Sean William @ 06:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keilana's RfA

[edit]

Replied to you. Further discussion might be more appropriate via email or IRC (Giggy). Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sean William @ 03:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks in turn. Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your continuing support in my latest, and finally successful, RfA. :) It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holidays and all the off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a great new year, --Elonka 18:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A request for your consideration regarding CAT:AOTR

[edit]

...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "O"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "P"s through "S"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++Lar: t/c 04:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Protection

[edit]

No there's not, at least not one that protection is going to help. My rational is on the talk page. John Reaves 21:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Rfa

[edit]

My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, and I'll do what I can to ensure your opinion of my suitability for adminship improves. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 04:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]