User talk:Seantrac
February 2008
[edit]
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you add an inappropriate image to a page, as you did to Eamonn Holmes, you will be blocked from editing. (First edit after return from block was to delete talk page warnings; second was vandalism.) Ckatzchatspy 19:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Captain_Smiths_Last_Picture.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Captain_Smiths_Last_Picture.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Moondance
[edit]I just undid this edit of yours in the "Moondance" article after your bout of honesty over at Simon Cowell's article. Should I go back further to find more dubious edits? - Dudesleeper / Talk 21:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2010
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Winston Churchill. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NJA (t/c) 15:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Seantrac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It was actually quite funny you prude!
Decline reason:
Not an unblock reason. Block extended indefinitely. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Seantrac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Rather unfair for an indefinite block, However, A. You've proved my point (Thankyou) B. Second account here I come!.
Decline reason:
No valid reason given for unblock. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The file File:Emerald Pipes.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
