User talk:Sergio.Tafur

Welcome!

Hello, Sergio.Tafur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as TrustPlus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TrustPlus

The article TrustPlus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I find no evidence of notability for this brand new service.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Imrovements to article

I have worked on and will continue to work on improving the article to help address the issues you have raised. Thank you for bringing them to my attention. The {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag was removed by another party without consulting with me, but I guess that's the nature of wikipedia. I am happy that party did remove that tag however, as I have edited the page to better reflect the notability of the topic of Trustplus.

As I continue to work to help this and potentially other articles of wikipedia improve (since I am new to the community), I look forward to continuing to receve feedback prior to any drastic measures being take with regards to the efforts I will be contributing my time to.

Thank you for your time, attention, and dedication to the ongoing wikipedia effort. I sincerely hope I may also be able to contribute to this growing source of information.

Sincerely, Dr. Tafur | Sergio.Tafur (talk) 23:40, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TrustPlus

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on TrustPlus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jersey92 (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of TrustPlus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TrustPlus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrustPlus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dolescum (talk) 00:11, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy delete nomination

Please do not delete the tag. If you wish to contest the speedy delete nomination please click the link and explain why. --Jersey92 (talk) 01:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TrustPlus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TrustPlus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jersey92 (talk) 01:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Objection to Deletion and creation of Draft Page

Though I still object to deletion of the currently published TRUSTplus page, I have created a TRUSTplus draft page for use in case it is deemed necessary: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:TRUSTplus&oldid=618753082 Sergio.Tafur (talk) 02:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

It needs to be the permalink from the actual article you copied from, not to the draft where it was copied to. Please provide the EXACT REVISION you used from TrustPlus, and then paste that to Draft talk:TRUSTplus explaining that it is the source of the draft. -- dsprc ^[talk] 02:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Article moved to Draft space

I have closed WP:Articles for deletion/TrustPlus as "move to draft" and moved the article to the Draft space at Draft:TRUSTplus. That over-wrote the copy you had made there, but it is a better solution because it preserves the article history, which the link you were asked to make on the talk page would not have done once the original article was deleted.

If you are connected with TRUSTplus, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide: Wikipedia's idea of conflict of interest is a broad one and not confined to financial interest. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TRUSTplus coin logo, July 2014.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TRUSTplus coin logo, July 2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:TRUSTplus

Hello Sergio.Tafur. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "TRUSTplus".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:TRUSTplus}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:TRUSTplus

Hello, Sergio.Tafur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TRUSTplus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 10^Eleventeen 05:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)