User talk:Serinde

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 18:54, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

More Hungarians![edit]

Szervusz! We need more Hungarians on Wikipedia! :) - Sensor 02:51, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

Thank you!!! :D most nagyon meg vagyok hatódva és még büszkébb vagyok a Miskolc szócikkre :) Alensha 17:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC) have you seen my translation of your Hungarian Cave Bath article? let's hope this one will end up on the main page too :D Alensha 23:04, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked, nice job! :) I only wish we had a more interesting picture to it like one of the hall or at least the "shell", which is currently under construction --Serinde 19:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good, but I don't visit baths often, especially in winter, and I'm not fond of the idea of paying 1600 just to take some photos :) I couldn't get to the shell because the construction workers fenced in the whole area. I'll try to find out whether we can use any photos from the official site, but I've just criticised their webmaster's work and I'm not sure it'll be taken kindly, so it'll be better to wait a while :) Alensha 23:24, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

Hi Serinde! I have seen you attached some tag to the Széchenyi image, I have uploaded. Thanks! I hope it will be not deleted. It was the first time I did this, I am still not sure what is the proper way:)kuko 12:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Segíts kérlek![edit]

Üdv! A segítségedre lenne szükségem. Írtam egy cikket a Délvidéki vérengzédekről, de PANNONIAN minduntalan kiforgatja és a cikk már-már arról szól, hogy a magyarok mind szemét nácik akik a szerbeket gyilkolták. Hol ott arról írok, hogy a jugoszláv partizánok 40000 ártatlan magyar embert mészároltak le. Kérlek segíts megmenteni a szócikket, és ne hagyd, hogy az ártatlan áldozatok nevét bemocskolják. A link: 1944-1945 Killings in Bačka HunTheGoaT 18:58, 29 September 2006 (CEST)

My RfA[edit]

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a tally of 91/1/4. I can't express how much it means to me to become an administrator. I'll work even more and harder to become useful for the community. If you need a helping hand, don't hesitate to contact me. NCurse _work 15:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1956[edit]

I checked it; seems to be correct. This will be a very good article in my opinion. – Alensha ^talk 13:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help - this has become a real battle! Istvan 16:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serinde, you may be happy to hear that 56 is now scheduled for FA on 23 October. Istvan 04:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

William the Silent[edit]

Hi, Serinde. That article no longer meets FA criteria, but there are over 400 articles in the same boat, and I/we can't review them all at once. If you want to submit it for review, you can, but I'm focusing on submitting the articles that are truly poorly written. If you find a lot of problems in that article, besides the lack of citations, you might want to submit it. Sandy 23:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Rosetta Stone as this week's WP:AID winner[edit]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Rosetta Stone was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 16:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]