User talk:Serraou41

Its good to be back!!![edit]

I am (was) Swe41 by the way...

But im ready to contribute again in every way possible!

Serraou41 (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

???[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Serraou41 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I being blocked? I have only just created this account... Serraou41 (talk) 10:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You admit to being a sockpuppet of blocked user Swe41 (talk · contribs). Requests for unblocking must come from the master account, and since its talk page access has been revoked, you have to apply to ArbCom as explained on User talk:Swe41. Favonian (talk) 10:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed Talk page access - ArbCom is the only valid route for requesting unblock now -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]