User talk:SesameRoad

Welcome to my talk page. SesameRoad 22:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

In the future, please attempt to reach a consensus on an article talk page before attempting a move. In the case of Natalee Holloway, this has been discussed and no consensus has been reached to support a move at this time. Also, please do not remove project banners from article talk pages. These banners allow Wikiprojects to categorize and keep track of articles that fall within their scope. Thanks, and happy editing. - auburnpilot talk 02:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus does not transfer from article to article

There is no consensus to move the Natalee Holloway article. Leave it alone. This is the second time this change is being reverted, so do not repeat it.Kww (talk) 04:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before warning others to learn the proper ways of Wikipedia, I'd recommend you take your own advice. Tags such as {{disputed}} do not belong on redirects, we do not move pages against consensus, and we do not start deletion discussions on top of old discussions. If you wish to properly nominate the article, you can learn how on WP:AfD. Also, before nominating with the rationale that it is a biography, and Wikipedia doesn't need one, you may want to read the article. It isn't a biography and such a deletion rationale is not likely to succeed, as it would be baseless. - auburnpilot talk 05:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are becoming disruptive. The relevant information within the Van der Sloot article was merged into the Natalee Holloway article and then redirected. See the discussion on the talk page before you continue to break redirects. - auburnpilot talk 05:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with our sockpuppetry policy? - auburnpilot talk 05:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/WatchingYouLikeAHawk for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. - auburnpilot talk 06:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalee Holloway (2nd nomination)

Closed, keep. Bearian (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Bearian (talk) 20:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Natalee Holloway

An editor has nominated Natalee Holloway, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalee Holloway (3rd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]