User talk:Setabepiw3547747

Setabepiw3547747, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Setabepiw3547747! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to International law has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: International law was changed by Setabepiw3547747 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940441 on 2017-05-12T10:49:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image changes[edit]

Hi, Setabepiw3547747. In the future, will you consider discussing image changes before implementing them? By this, I mean first proposing the change on the article take page and waiting a few days for editors to weigh in. I state this because images, especially images at controversial or otherwise contentious articles, have often been discussed before. In some cases, WP:Consensus is for no image; in other cases, WP:Consensus is for an existing image. A new discussion on such matters can help assess new consensus and prevent WP:Edit warring. Of course, it's fine to be WP:Bold, but discussion first is often a good route to take. If the image change is unlikely to be contested, as is the case with many non-contentious articles, then I would state that proposing the change on the talk page first is not necessary. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I could see that.Setabepiw3547747 (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I see that your second edit with this account did just that. I am far from under the impression that you are new to editing here, but I decided that I would focus on the image matter since it appears that you are mainly focusing on images at this point in time and have had some push-back on images. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, take it easy on the religious and mythology images as lead images. People can easily come to the conclusion that you are pushing a religious POV across articles. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 11:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Undertale does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I know you've been using this edit summary for some of your edits, but I'd like to suggest giving yourself a reminder. It really helps for us to know what has been changed before we review the edit. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. My last edit summary does not have anything because I did not see this yet, pardon please.Setabepiw3547747 (talk) 02:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]