User talk:Sexyeamo

Welcome[edit]

Hi,

I noticed you were new here so I thought I'd add a couple of welcome messages as they've got some useful links.

If you've got any questions about WP, feel free to put them on my talk page and I'll see if I can help.

CTOAGN 23:30, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Hi,

I noticed you were new and had been editing football articles, so I thought I'd give you a few links that it took me a while to find. Hope they're useful.

User:Sjorford/Football - comprehensive list of football articles on Wikipedia
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football - place to discuss football articles
Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Association football - good page for editors who are interested in football

Dean Delaney[edit]

If your original version hadn't been such a piece of shyte I would have been happy to leave it alone. It's better now. Babajobu 17:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your test[edit]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Fire Star 14:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bollix[edit]

Thanks for your message on my talk page. I took your advice and looked up "Bollix" using Google. Here's what I found [1] says it means testicles. [2] says its "The Irish pronunciation of 'bollocks'". [3] again has "testicles". [4] says its an alternative spelling of "bollocks". Not one mention of your suggested definition that I could find. Anyway, thanks for helping me confirm this is likely not true. Gwernol 12:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I've listed Bollix as an Article for deletion. This means the Wikipedia community has the opportunity to discuss the merits of this article and can reach a consensus on whether the article should be deleted or kept. Another possibility is it would be redirected to the existing Bollocks article or merged there. Please add your opinion to the discussion: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bollix. By the way, you seem to be under the impression that I have some authority here - I don't I'm just a regular editor like you. You also seem to think this is somehow an "ego trip" for me - I'm not sure what gave you that impression. If Bollix is really a different term with different meaning than Bollocks then I'd love to see Wikipedia cover it. But you'll need some level of verifiable evidence to show this is the case. I encourage you to provide that, in which case I'd happily change my opinion and support this article. Best, Gwernol 13:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good! Just be aware that sometimes things are not what they seem and the meaning of words changes all the time. In Ireland bollix means male genitalia and is a singular plural. The origins of the word may be from the term bollocks but it has evolved in Ireland for good or for bad and has a distinctly different meaning to the original there now therefore I believe it warrants its own page. The ironic thing is even some Irish people have forgotten the Irish meaning of the word because of the exposure of British culture. Hence we have our current problem where most people associate the two as the same when in fact they are fairly unique. It's the same thing which has occurred with the term Ulster. Everybody in Briain and the rest of the English speaking world seem to think that Northern Ireland is Ulster when in fact Northern Ireland is just six of the nine counties that make up Ulster. But things like that get easily forgotten when one culture is more dominant than another in our modern multimedia world.

Sexyeamo

Zeitgeist - The Movie[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Zeitgeist - The Movie, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wikiprotest.com/index.php?title=Zeitgeist_the_Movie. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 00:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist (disambiguation)[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeitgeist the Movie. If you think it needs an article then go and make your case at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Continuing to add it to the disambiguation page will just lead to your being blocked. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tha would be blocked for disruption. Did you even bother with Wikipedia:Deletion review? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2018 FIFA World Cup bids[edit]

This has been one of the hardest pages to keep in some neutral, stable, citable state, and I have to revert your edit from today. It seems every user who comes to the page seems to bring their own country to root for. While I appreciate your desire to fill out the Australia section of the 2018 FIFA World Cup bids article, I wish we could do it with sourced material and not original research and speculation. The list of stadia is a particular problem. Yes those stadia exist and have that capacity, but until the are specified and named by an official source, I'm afraid it is pure speculation. The issue with the one stadium per city rule is one that effects pretty much all bids, and I do wish that there was more about it in the Background section at the top, but what we don't need is any users personal thoughts how it affects the bid. You say there are "other critics", can you get articles or sources for them. I don't think the imperative is on me or any other user to find sources for material you add. There's a lot of work to do on the article to get it up to snuff, and hopefully we can improve it within the limitations mentioned.--Patrick Ѻ 20:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tottenham Hotspur[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Tottenham Hotspur F.C., is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page 2010 FIFA World Cup qualification has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 23:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go fuck yourself!

Nomination of Naqsha Bibi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naqsha Bibi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naqsha Bibi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 06:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to British Isles, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 18:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Hi, on 23 Oct you left the following message on my talk page, and it seems your most recent edit was from 16 October 2018 (diff), while I made a number of edits as the Jamal Khashoggi article developed, I am not sure which of my contributions you mean. So, following your message ("If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page."), I ask you here.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jamal Khashoggi, did not appear constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sexyeamo(talk) 22:35, 23 October 2018 (EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexyeamo (talk • contribs)

Thanks, WikiHannibal (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Grant[edit]

Hello, Sexyeamo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Grant, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Grant[edit]

Hello, Sexyeamo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Grant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]