Jump to content

User talk:DrGeorge22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Sgkukolich)

Sgkukolich, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Sgkukolich! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Minor edits are minor

[edit]

See WP:MINOR for what qualifies about minor. David notMD (talk) 01:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography

[edit]

Wikipedia dislikes attempts at autobiography (see WP:AUTO) but does not prohibit. A success at creating a biography requires multiple refs to content that is about you. Referencing your own journal articles contributes nothing toward establishing your nobility. David notMD (talk) 01:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David,
Thanks for your efforts. I have received multiple offers from "editors" who say they can fix my page so it is published. What are the chances of success by one of these persons? Best, Steve DrGeorge22 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi DrGeorge22! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, paid editors?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Kukolich (July 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stephen Kukolich

[edit]

Information icon Hello, DrGeorge22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stephen Kukolich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Kukolich has been accepted

[edit]
Stephen Kukolich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for reviewing and favorable review. I will continue trying to improve the page. Your efforts are sincerely appreciated.
Best regards, Steve Kukolich DrGeorge22 (talk) 21:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]