User talk:Shadow8821
May 2010[edit]
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. UnkleFester (talk) 05:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
March 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from George Lois. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. In particular I'm referring to that reference you removed. Minimac's Clone (Vandalise here) 17:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I reverted your edit because it was incorrectly formatted and messed up the page. It also contained a great deal of what appear to be your opinion and analysis of the cited controversies, rather than adding further details that cited a reliable source. Commentary such as "amazing, world altering advertising", "hard to believe" and "genius" all appears to be your personal opinion and is not neutrally phrased, as an encyclopaedia should be. But please, if you believe to cited controversy can be refuted, and you can cite sources that do it, then please add references to it. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 02:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)