User talk:Shashanka Hazra

My talk page

Garibbati moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Garibbati, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Garibbati has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Garibbati. Thanks! Hitro talk 10:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garibbati has been accepted

Garibbati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shashanka Hazra

Thank you for creating Ghagra, Purba Bardhaman.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

a ref for the population figure would be great

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shashanka Hazra

Thank you for creating Korakdal.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add a ref for the population figure

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shashanka Hazra

Thank you for creating Kondaipur, Purba Bardhaman.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add a ref for the population figure

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Purangan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Purangan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 09:05, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Purangan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Purangan. Thanks! Hitro talk 09:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Purangan (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Poorly referenced, per the previous comment.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Purangan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 10:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shashanka Hazra! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 10:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Purangan has been accepted

Purangan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir this is my account. And here I want to work selflessly I am new here now so I have given less resources in future I will make page with more resources and develop the page with proper correct information develop the page if anyone unblock my account then I will be specially benefited and There are villages nearby than us I can show them here to everyone please sir if possible unblock this account of mine have a look Shashanka Hazra (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shashanka Hazra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes sir this is my account. And here I want to work selflessly I am new here now so I have given less resources in future I will make page with more resources and develop the page with proper correct information develop the page if anyone unblock my account then I will be specially benefited and There are villages nearby than us I can show them here to everyone please sir if possible unblock this account of mine have a look Shashanka Hazra (talk) 16:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.