User talk:Snape2324

September 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Myrtle Beach International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. VenFlyer98 (talk) 01:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not changing or adding content with no evidence, however I am new to Wikipedia and don't really know how to add sources. So I am asking you to stop being annoying and removing the additions, because they are all based off of https://www.flightradar24.com I would be happy if you tell me how to cite that website because it's not very easy. Shayan MB24 (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What you have added, here and RDU, are all charter & relocation flights. For example, college teams may play a game in Raleigh/Durham, but then need to play a game near Myrtle Beach and will charter a flight. These are not sold to the public and are typically never repeated. Other flights (such as the ones between Raleigh & Norfolk), an aircraft may be needed in Norfolk and since Raleigh/Durham has a small base for Delta, Delta will then fly a realignment flight so the aircraft can then go out if Norfolk. Bentheswimmer11 (talk) 00:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in the above reply, you are adding charter flights. You need a better source than FlightRadar. My first reply includes a link that explains everything about sourcing. Thank you! VenFlyer98 (talk) 01:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at İzmir Adnan Menderes Airport. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Revert unexplained removals The Banner talk 10:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Munich Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Unexplained removals The Banner talk 10:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not engaging in disruptive editing. The ones being disruptive are the users who undo my edits, I only removed 3 Turkish locations from Lufthansa that are solely operated by their partner SunExpress. Shayan MB24 (talk) 02:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are removing text without explanation or sources, That is a form of disruptive editing. The Banner talk 02:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I literally explained why I remove them, you can check the Lufthansa website and numerous airline tracking networks, all of Lufthansa’s flights to those 3 locations are operated by SunExpress which are correctly listed. What you are doing should be considered disruptive, because you are misinforming the public with undoing my edits. Shayan MB24 (talk) 05:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But do you have prove of your claims? It is up to you to provide that proof. The Banner talk 11:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be up to you to prove that Lufthansa operates those flights with its own aircraft. Otherwise it should be removed as unsourced material. You think you can run a dictatorship here and do whatever you want? You should prove that Lufthansa operates the flights to Ankara, Bodrum, and Izmir and the I will not touch this page. If you keep being annoying, I might have to report you to wikipedia. Shayan MB24 (talk) 15:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry. Your are changing it, so it is up to you to prove it. There must by some evidence of your claims, don't you think? The Banner talk 17:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my god. You must be the most annoying bot on the internet. How much evidence do you need? Is Flight Aware reliable enough for you? This is the flight to Ankara and Izmir: https://flightaware.com/live/flight/DLH9585 https://flightaware.com/live/flight/DLH9581 You can track the flight number in any website or app you would like. All of Lufthansa’s flights to these destinations are operated by SunExpress. You must stop acting like a dictator on this server. Shayan MB24 (talk) 19:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I am not a bot but a living person. Second, give evidence when you edit. And no, it is not a case that I have to look it up but you have to provide the info in your edit. The Banner talk 00:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Palma de Mallorca Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. VenFlyer98 (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IranAir Terminated Destinations

Please avoid removing Terminated Destinations of IranAir, those destinations are locations that are were previously served by the Company, Removal of such evidence without source is not acceptable for change, Thank You.

لطفاً از حذف مقاصد پایان یافته ایران ایر خودداری کنید، آن مقاصد مکان هایی هستند که قبلاً توسط شرکت ارائه شده است، حذف چنین مدارکی بدون منبع برای تغییر قابل قبول نیست، با تشکر. 205.222.250.104 (talk) 16:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If they are terminated there is no longer any use for having them. I do not understand the point of having the terminated destinations still listed. I work based off protocols of other wikipedia pages for airline destinations, none of which include terminated destinations. Shayan MB24 (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear [Shayan MB24],

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to discuss an issue regarding the inclusion of terminated destinations on airline pages in Wikipedia. I have noticed that you have been removing such information, and I would like to take this opportunity to explain why it is important to include them and how other airlines have approached this matter.

First and foremost, it is vital to acknowledge that including terminated destinations on airline pages contributes to the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the information provided. Wikipedia strives to be an authoritative and reliable source of knowledge, and by documenting the historical record of an airline's past destinations, we ensure that readers have access to a complete and comprehensive view of its operational history.

Furthermore, many other reputable airlines and their respective Wikipedia pages include information about terminated destinations. By doing so, they provide a more holistic picture of the airline's network and its evolution over time. Understanding an airline's past destinations can be valuable for various reasons, such as researching the airline's market strategy, identifying trends in route development, or assessing the airline's historical connectivity.

Including terminated destinations also benefits travelers who rely on Wikipedia for information. Passengers often plan their trips based on the destinations served by an airline. By providing accurate information about past destinations, readers gain insights into the airline's previous connections, which can be helpful for those researching historical routes or analyzing the airline's expansion or contraction patterns.

It is important to note that including terminated destinations does not imply that the airline currently operates to those locations. Instead, it serves as a record of the airline's historical operations and contributes to a comprehensive understanding of its network development. In Wikipedia, we strive to present a balanced view of a subject by incorporating relevant and verified information, and the inclusion of terminated destinations aligns with this goal.

I kindly request that you reconsider the removal of terminated destinations from airline pages and take into account the reasons outlined above. By including this information, we ensure that Wikipedia continues to be a reliable and comprehensive source of knowledge for readers interested in the aviation industry.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia content, and I trust that we can find a mutually beneficial solution.

Thank you for your time and I hope we are both on the same page. 72.83.240.33 (talk) 23:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your transparency and providing great reasoning behind your editing choices. I can see that you really care about the accuracy on such matters and I will note that when editing various pages. Again thank you for your input. Shayan MB24 (talk) 23:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind my leaving this comment, but that essay that the IP wrote caught my eye, and according to this website, it was written by AI. Sunnya343 (talk) 06:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Maungapohatu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Edinburgh Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maungapohatu (talk) 22:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shayan MB24 please find a reference that supports what you say. The reference needs to say that the moscow detail is seasonal. You searching online booking engines is not something you can do to support such detail. You or anyone has no idea why you can buy a ticket on one day and not another. I note that the map on that reference does not indicate that the flight is seasonal. Maungapohatu (talk) 02:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sunnya343 (talk) 02:24, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about edit warring at Mehrabad International Airport

Please note that while I am not currently blocking either of you, you are both engaged in an edit war at Mehrabad International Airport; please take this as a warning to discontinue reverting in this manner, as further edit warring may lead to one of both editors being blocked. Use the article's talk page and come to a consensus before reverting each other further; dispute resolution options such as WP:3O and WP:DRN are available if outside input in needed to help reach a consensus on the material. Thank you. - Aoidh (talk) 19:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables

I have started a request for comments on the "Airlines and destinations" tables. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sunnya343 (talk) 16:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mehrabad

Sorry, I forgot to mention here that I moved the discussion to the Mehrabad article talk page, so anyone who has the article on their watchlist can also see it. Sunnya343 (talk) 06:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sunnya343 (talk) 07:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shayan MB24 rather than edit warring can I suggest you respond at WP:ANI. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shayan MB24 as I pointed out in my summary if you wish to challenge the closure of the RFC see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Editting to argue a WP:POINT is inadvisable. Even without that WP:BURDEN is policy, you must provide references for challenged content. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 01:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]